SynthesisPloS one2017
Does stroke volume variation predict fluid responsiveness in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cardiac output measurement in Malawian children ages 2 months-12 years hospitalised with severe anaemia (COM-TRACT).International health · 2026Trial
- The role of the tidal volume challenge test in volume responsiveness assessment: a narrative review.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2025Review
- Accuracy of Respiratory Variation in Inferior Vena Cava Diameter to Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Children Under Mechanical Ventilation.Pediatric cardiology · 2024Article
- Predictive Value of the Respiratory Variation in Inferior Vena Cava Diameter for Ventilated Children With Septic Shock.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
- Dynamic parameters for fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated children: A systematic review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Dynamic variables predict fluid responsiveness in pre-school and school children undergoing neurosurgery: a prospective observational study.Translational pediatrics · 2021Article
- Assessment of Volume Status and Fluid Responsiveness in Small Animals.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Review
- [Clinical application of blood purification in treatment of severe adenovirus pneumonia].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2020Article
- Prediction of Fluid Responsiveness by Stroke Volume Variation in Children Undergoing Fontan Operation.BioMed research international · 2020Article
- Increasing Cardiovascular Data Sampling Frequency and Referencing It to Baseline Improve Hemorrhage Detection.Critical care explorations · 2019Article
- Article
- Determining pediatric fluid responsiveness by stroke volume variation analysis using ICON® electrical cardiometry and ultrasonic cardiac output monitor: A cross-sectional study.International journal of critical illness and injury scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveStroke volume variation (SVV) is a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness in adult patients. However, the predictive value of SVV is uncertain in pediatric patients. We performed the first systematic meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic value of SVV in predicting fluid responsiveness in children.
methodsPUBMED, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to December 2016. Original studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of SVV in predicting fluid responsiveness in children were considered to be eligible. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled values of sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio with 95% CI. The summary receiver operating characteristic curve was estimated and area under the curve was calculated. Quality of the studies was assessed with the QUADAS-2 tool.
resultsSix studies with a total of 279 fluid boluses in 224 children were included. The analysis demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 0.68 (95% CI,0.59-0.76), pooled specificity of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.57-0.73), pooled diagnostic odds ratio of 8.24 (95% CI, 2.58-26.30), and the summary area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81. However, significant inter-study heterogeneity was found (p<0.05, I2 = 61.3%), likely due to small sample size and diverse study characteristics.
conclusionsCurrent evidence suggests that SVV was of diagnostic value in predicting fluid responsiveness in children under mechanical ventilation. Given the high heterogeneity of published data, further studies are needed to confirm the diagnostic accuracy of SVV in predicting fluid responsiveness in pediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.