Trial reportPloS one2017
Safety and immunogenicity of an inactivated whole cell tuberculosis vaccine booster in adults primed with BCG: A randomized, controlled trial of DAR-901.
Trial report in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02063555 (A Phase 1, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multiple-Dose, Dose-Ranging Study of the Safety and Immunogenicity of DAR-901, a Killed, Non-Tuberculous Mycobacterial Vaccine, in HIV-negative and HIV-positive Adults Who Have Previously Received BCG), which is not on this map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 1, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Multiple-Dose, Dose-Ranging Study of the Safety and Immunogenicity of DAR-901, a Killed, Non-Tuberculous Mycobacterial Vaccine, in HIV-negative and HIV-positive Adults Who Have Previously Received BCG
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.
- The potential of CBC-derived ratios (monocyte-to-lymphocyte, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte, and platelet-to-lymphocyte) to predict or diagnose incident TB infection in Tanzanian adolescents.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Trial
- CD4+ T cell cytokine responses to the DAR-901 booster vaccine in BCG-primed adults: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial.PloS one · 2019Trial
- Altruism, Scepticism, and collective decision-making in foreign-born U.S. residents in a tuberculosis vaccine trial.BMC public health · 2018Trial
- HowVaccines · 2026Review
- Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacteriology and immunity necessitate a multi-pronged immune strategy for vaccination.NPJ vaccines · 2026Review
- Inactivated mycobacterium paragordonae delivered via microneedle patches as a novel tuberculosis booster vaccine.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Immunotherapy for tuberculosis: current strategies and future directions.Military Medical Research · 2025Review
- The delivery of new tuberculosis vaccines to people living with HIV - when to vaccinate?BMC infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Immunity AgainstVaccines · 2025Article
- Tuberculosis vaccines and therapeutic drug: challenges and future directions.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
- BCG and beyond: unlocking new frontiers in TB vaccine development.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Humoral correlate of vaccine-mediated protection from tuberculosis identified in humans and non-human primates.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- The BCG vaccine, advantages, and disadvantages of introducing new generation vaccines againstClinical and experimental vaccine research · 2024Review
- Tuberculosis vaccine developments and efficient delivery systems: A comprehensive appraisal.Heliyon · 2024Review
- From pathogenesis to antigens: the key to shaping the future of TB vaccines.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Advances in the development of new vaccines for tuberculosis and Brazil's role in the effort forward the end TB strategy.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2024Article
- Review
- Diagnostic value of the neutrophil lymphocyte ratio in discrimination between tuberculosis and bacterial community acquired pneumonia: AJournal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2023Review
- Review
- Vaccines against Tuberculosis: Where Are We Now?Vaccines · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDevelopment of a tuberculosis vaccine to boost BCG is a major international health priority. SRL172, an inactivated whole cell booster derived from a non-tuberculous mycobacterium, is the only new vaccine against tuberculosis to have demonstrated efficacy in a Phase 3 trial. In the present study we sought to determine if a three-dose series of DAR-901 manufactured from the SRL172 master cell bank by a new, scalable method was safe and immunogenic.
methodsWe performed a single site, randomized, double-blind, controlled, Phase 1 dose escalation trial of DAR-901 at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in the United States. Healthy adult subjects age 18-65 with prior BCG immunization and a negative interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) were enrolled in cohorts of 16 subjects and randomized to three injections of DAR-901 (n = 10 per cohort), or saline placebo (n = 3 per cohort), or two injections of saline followed by an injection of BCG (n = 3 per cohort; 1-8 x 106 CFU). Three successive cohorts were enrolled representing DAR-901 at 0.1, 0.3, and 1 mg per dose. Randomization was performed centrally and treatments were masked from staff and volunteers. Subsequent open label cohorts of HIV-negative/IGRA-positive subjects (n = 5) and HIV-positive subjects (n = 6) received three doses of 1 mg DAR-901. All subjects received three immunizations at 0, 2 and 4 months administered as 0.1 mL injections over the deltoid muscle alternating between right and left arms. The primary outcomes were safety and immunogenicity. Subjects were followed for 6 months after dose 3 for safety and had phlebotomy performed for safety studies and immune assays before and after each injection. Immune assays using peripheral blood mononuclear cells included cell-mediated IFN-γ responses to DAR-901 lysate and to Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) lysate; serum antibody to M. tuberculosis lipoarabinomannan was assayed by ELISA.
resultsDAR-901 had an acceptable safety profile and was well-tolerated at all dose levels in all treated subjects. No serious adverse events were reported. Median (range) 7-day erythema and induration at the injection site for 1 mg DAR-901 were 10 (4-20) mm and 10 (4-16) mm, respectively, and for BCG, 30 (10-107) mm and 38 (15-55) mm, respectively. Three mild AEs, all headaches, were considered possibly related to DAR-901. No laboratory or vital signs abnormalities were related to immunization. Compared to pre-vaccination responses, three 1 mg doses of DAR-901 induced statistically significant increases in IFN-γ response to DAR-901 lysate and MTB lysate, and in antibody responses to M. tuberculosis lipoarabinomannan. Ten subjects who received 1 mg DAR-901 remained IFN-γ release assay (IGRA) negative after three doses of vaccine.
conclusionsA three-injection series of DAR-901 was well-tolerated, had an acceptable safety profile, and induced cellular and humoral immune responses to mycobacterial antigens. DAR-901 is advancing to efficacy trials.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT02063555.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.