Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28498810›Full record

SynthesisOncotarget2017

The prognostic value of GLUT1 in cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Min Yu, Han Yongzhi, Shengying Chen, Xiaodan Luo, Ye Lin, Yu Zhou, Haosheng Jin, Baohua Hou, Yanying Deng, Lei Tu and 1 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Min YuDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Han YongzhiDepartment of Dermatology, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, Guangzhou, China.
Shengying ChenDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaodan LuoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Science, Guangzhou, China.
Ye LinDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yu ZhouDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Haosheng JinDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Baohua HouDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Yanying DengDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Lei TuDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Zhixiang JianDepartment of General Surgery, Guangdong General Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increased glycolysis is one of the hallmarks of cancer. The abnormal expression of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) was reported to be associated with resistance to current therapy and poor prognosis. Numerous studies have investigated the correlation between GLUT1 expression and prognosis in cancers, but the conclusions are still controversial. Here, we conducted a meta-analysis to explore the association between GLUT1 and survival in human cancers. PubMed, Springer, Medline, and Cochrane Library were searched carefully to identify eligible studies evaluating prognostic value of GLUT1 in cancers. Twenty-seven studies with 4079 patients were included in the present study. Our pooled results identified that increased expression of GLUT1 was associated with unfavorable overall survival (HR = 1.780, 95% CI = 1.574-.013, p < 0.001)) and poorer disease-free survival (HR = 1.95, 95% CI = 1.229-3.095, p = 0.003). Furthermore, overexpression of GLUT1 linked with poor differentiated tumors (RR = 1.380, 95% CI = 1.086-1.755, p = 0.009; I2 = 72.0%, p < 0.001), positive lymph node metastasis (RR = 1.395, 95% CI = 1.082-1.799, p = 0.010; I2 = 70.8%, p = 0.002) and larger tumor size (RR = 1.405, 95% CI = 1.231-1.603, p < 0.001; I2 = 37.3%, p = 0.093). This systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that the GLUT1 may serve as an ideal prognostic biomarker in various cancers.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorGlucose Transporter Type 1HumansNeoplasm GradingNeoplasmsNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsPublication BiasBiomarkers, TumorGlucose Transporter Type 1cancerglucose transporter 1glycolysisprognostic markersurvival

Identifiers

PMID28498810
PMCPMC5522151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.