Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28498729›Full record

ArticleVirulence2017

The distinct function of Tep2 and Tep6 in the immune defense of Drosophila melanogaster against the pathogen Photorhabdus.

Upasana Shokal, Hannah Kopydlowski, Ioannis Eleftherianos

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virulence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. A balance between vector survival and virus transmission is achieved through JAK/STAT signaling inhibition by a plant virus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. TGF-β Signaling Interferes With theFrontiers in physiology · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Rapid seasonal evolution in innate immunity of wildProceedings. Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Upasana Shokala Insect Infection and Immunity Lab, Department of Biological Sciences , Institute for Biomedical Sciences, The George Washington University , Washington DC , USA.
Hannah Kopydlowskia Insect Infection and Immunity Lab, Department of Biological Sciences , Institute for Biomedical Sciences, The George Washington University , Washington DC , USA.
Ioannis Eleftherianosa Insect Infection and Immunity Lab, Department of Biological Sciences , Institute for Biomedical Sciences, The George Washington University , Washington DC , USA.
George Washington University · US

Funding

Role of TGF-beta signaling in the Drosophila immune response against nematode-bacteria complexesR01AI110675 · NIAID · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ELEFTHERIANOS, IOANNIS · 2015 to 2018
$954k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI110675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous and recent investigations on the innate immune response of Drosophila have identified certain mechanisms that promote pathogen elimination. However, the function of Thioester-containing proteins (TEPs) in the fly still remains elusive. Recently we have shown the contribution of TEP4 in the antibacterial immune defense of Drosophila against non-pathogenic E. coli, and the pathogens Photorhabdus luminescens and P. asymbiotica. Here we studied the function of Tep genes in both humoral and cellular immunity upon E. coli and Photorhabdus infection. We found that while Tep2 is induced after Photorhabdus and E. coli infection; Tep6 is induced by P. asymbiotica only. Moreover, functional ablation of hemocytes results in significantly low transcript levels of Tep2 and Tep6 in response to Photorhabdus. We show that Tep2 and Tep6 loss-of-function mutants have prolonged survival against P. asymbiotica, Tep6 mutants survive better the infection of P. luminescens, and both tep mutants are resistant to E. coli and Photorhabdus. We also find a distinct pattern of immune signaling pathway induction in E. coli or Photorhabdus infected Tep2 and Tep6 mutants. We further show that Tep2 and Tep6 participate in the activation of hemocytes in Drosophila responding to Photorhabdus. Finally, inactivation of Tep2 or Tep6 affects phagocytosis and melanization in flies infected with Photorhabdus. Our results indicate that distinct Tep genes might be involved in different yet crucial functions in the Drosophila antibacterial immune response.

Indexed as

AnimalsCytokinesDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEscherichia coliHemocytesImmunity, InnatePhagocytosisPhotorhabdusSerpinsCytokinesDrosophila ProteinsMcr protein, DrosophilaSerpinsTEP2 protein, Drosophilathioester-containing protein-4, DrosophilaDrosophilaimmunityPhotorhabdusthioester-containing protein

Identifiers

PMID28498729
PMCPMC5810505
OpenAlexW2612656630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.