Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28498615›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical nursing2018

Understanding the impact of haemodialysis on UK National Health Service patients' well-being: A qualitative investigation.

Daniel Jw Jones, Kate Harvey, John P Harris, Laurie T Butler, Emma C Vaux

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical nursing, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. High rates of psychological distress, mental health diagnoses and suicide attempts in people with chronic kidney disease in Ireland.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel Jw JonesSchool of Psychology, University of Reading Malaysia, Nusajaya, Johor, Malaysia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2008-9658
Kate HarveySchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, UK.
John P HarrisSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, UK.
Laurie T ButlerSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire, UK.
Emma C VauxDepartment of Renal Medicine, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, UK.
University of Reading · GBNewcastle University Medicine Malaysia · MYRoyal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

AIMS AND

objectivesWhile haemodialysis is an effective treatment for end-stage renal disease, the requirements and restrictions it imposes on patients can be onerous. The aim of this study was to obtain UK National Health Service patients' perspectives on the challenges arising from haemodialysis with the intention of identifying potential improvements.

backgroundDepression rates are particularly high in those with end-stage renal disease; however, there is limited insight into the range of stressors associated with haemodialysis treatment within the National Health Service contributing to such high rates, particularly those of a cognitive or psychological nature.

designA qualitative approach was used to obtain rich, patient-focused data; one-to-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with twenty end-stage renal disease at a UK National Health Service centre.

methodsPatients were interviewed during a typical haemodialysis session. Thematic analysis was used to systematically interpret the data. Codes were created in an inductive and cyclical process using a constant comparative approach.

resultsThree themes emerged from the data: (i) fluctuations in cognitive/physical well-being across the haemodialysis cycle, (ii) restrictions arising from the haemodialysis treatment schedule, (iii) emotional impact of haemodialysis on the self and others. The findings are limited to predominantly white, older patients (median = 74 years) within a National Health Service setting.

conclusionsSeveral of the experiences reported by patients as challenging and distressing have so far been overlooked in the literature. A holistic-based approach to treatment, acknowledging all aspects of a patient's well-being, is essential if optimal quality of life is to be achieved by healthcare providers. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The findings can be used to inform future interventions and guidelines aimed at improving patients' treatment adherence and outcomes, for example, improved reliable access to mental health specialists.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDepressionFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicKidney Failure, ChronicMaleMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsRenal Dialysischronic kidney diseasehaemodialysispsychological well-beingpsychologyqualitative study

Identifiers

PMID28498615
PMCPMC6853155
OpenAlexW2613958799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.