ArticleWorld psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA)2017
Has the rising placebo response impacted antidepressant clinical trial outcome? Data from the US Food and Drug Administration 1987-2013.
Article in World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and tolerability of zuranolone in patients with depression: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- An investigation of the constancy of effect in Cochrane systematic reviews in context with the assumptions for noninferiority trials.BMC medical research methodology · 2022Pooled it
- Magnitude of the Placebo Response Across Treatment Modalities Used for Treatment-Resistant Depression in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2021Pooled it
- Brexanolone in Postpartum Depression:Journal of women's health (2002) · 2021Pooled it
- Age, sex, disease severity, and disease duration difference in placebo response: implications from a meta-analysis of diabetes mellitus.BMC medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Raising Placebo Efficacy in Antidepressant Trials Across Decades Explained by Small-Study Effects: A Meta-Reanalysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Pooled it
- Placebo Response in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials.The Journal of rheumatology · 2020Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-surgical brain stimulation for the acute treatment of major depressive episodes in adults: systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2019Pooled it
- Neuropathic pain clinical trials: factors associated with decreases in estimated drug efficacy.Pain · 2018Pooled it
- Lumateperone monotherapy for major depressive episodes associated with bipolar disorder: efficacy and safety in a randomized placebo-controlled trial.International clinical psychopharmacology · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and safety of zuranolone co-initiated with an antidepressant in adults with major depressive disorder: results from the phase 3 CORAL study.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2024Trial
- Placebo response mitigation with a participant-focused psychoeducational procedure: a randomized, single-blind, all placebo study in major depressive and psychotic disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021Trial
- A phase II randomized trial of sodium oligomannate in Alzheimer's dementia.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2020Trial
- Opioid system modulation with buprenorphine/samidorphan combination for major depressive disorder: two randomized controlled studies.Molecular psychiatry · 2020Trial
- Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Esketamine Adjunctive to Oral Antidepressant Therapy in Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA psychiatry · 2018Trial
- Trial
- Acupuncture for cancer symptoms: Clinical application and longitudinal impact a retrospective observational real-world data study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Observational
- Polypharmacy and pharmacogenomics in high-acuity behavioral health care for autism spectrum disorder: a retrospective study.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2025Article
- [Placebo effect in the treatment with antidepressants : Implications for the scientific evaluation and clinical use of pharmaceutical treatments of depression].Der Nervenarzt · 2025Review
- Current progress in targeted pharmacotherapy to treat symptoms of major depressive disorder: moving from broad-spectrum treatments to precision psychiatry.CNS spectrums · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issuedCorrection.2017
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
More than fifteen years ago, it was noted that the failure rate of antidepressant clinical trials was high, and such negative outcomes were thought to be related to the increasing magnitude of placebo response. However, there is considerable debate regarding this phenomenon and its relationship to outcomes in more recent antidepressant clinical trials. To investigate this, we accessed the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviews for sixteen antidepressants (85 trials, 115 trial arms, 23,109 patients) approved between 1987 and 2013. We calculated the magnitude of placebo and antidepressant responses, antidepressant-placebo differences, as well as the effect sizes and success rates, and compared these measures over time. Exploratory analysis investigated potential changes in trial design and conduct over time. As expected, the magnitude of placebo response has steadily grown in the past 30 years, increasing since 2000 by 6.4% (r=0.46, p<0.001). Contrary to expectations, a similar increase has occurred in the magnitude of antidepressant response (6.0%, r=0.37, p<0.001). Thus, the effect sizes (0.30 vs. 0.29, p=0.42) and the magnitude of antidepressant-placebo differences (10.5% vs. 10.3%, p=0.37) have remained statistically equivalent. Furthermore, the frequency of positive trial arms has gone up in the past 15 years (from 47.8% to 63.8%), but this difference in frequency has not reached statistical significance. Trial design features that were previously associated with a possible lower magnitude of placebo response were not implemented, and their relationship to the magnitude of placebo response could not be replicated. Of the 34 recent trials, two implemented enhanced interview techniques, but both of them were unsuccessful. The results of this study suggest that the relationship between the magnitude of placebo response and the outcome of antidepressant clinical trials is weak at best. These data further indicate that antidepressant-placebo differences are about the same for all of the sixteen antidepressants approved by the FDA in the past thirty years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.