Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28498564›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2018

Spatial Bayesian latent factor regression modeling of coordinate-based meta-analysis data.

Silvia Montagna, Tor Wager, Lisa Feldman Barrett, Timothy D Johnson, Thomas E Nichols

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A Cortical Surface-Based Meta-Analysis of Human Reasoning.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Bayesian Spatial Blind Source Separation via the Thresholded Gaussian Process.Journal of the American Statistical Association · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The coordinate-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging data.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Silvia MontagnaSchool of Mathematics, Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Kent, Canterbury CT2 7FS, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4421-5527
Tor WagerDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, U.S.A.
Lisa Feldman BarrettDepartment of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, U.S.A.
Timothy D JohnsonBiostatistics Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, U.S.A.
Thomas E NicholsDepartment of Statistics, University of Warwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, UK.

Funding

Neural Mechanisms of Social Decision Making in AgingR01AG030311 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BARRETT, LISA FELDMAN, DICKERSON, BRADFORD C · 2006 to 2016
$5.6M
fMRI-based Biomarkers for Multiple Components of PainR01DA035484 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI WAGER, TOR D. · 2013 to 2017
$3.1M
Bayesian Spatial Point Process Modeling of Neuroimage DataR01NS075066 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JOHNSON, TIMOTHY D · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG030311NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA035484NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS075066Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 100309/Z/12/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Now over 20 years old, functional MRI (fMRI) has a large and growing literature that is best synthesised with meta-analytic tools. As most authors do not share image data, only the peak activation coordinates (foci) reported in the article are available for Coordinate-Based Meta-Analysis (CBMA). Neuroimaging meta-analysis is used to (i) identify areas of consistent activation; and (ii) build a predictive model of task type or cognitive process for new studies (reverse inference). To simultaneously address these aims, we propose a Bayesian point process hierarchical model for CBMA. We model the foci from each study as a doubly stochastic Poisson process, where the study-specific log intensity function is characterized as a linear combination of a high-dimensional basis set. A sparse representation of the intensities is guaranteed through latent factor modeling of the basis coefficients. Within our framework, it is also possible to account for the effect of study-level covariates (meta-regression), significantly expanding the capabilities of the current neuroimaging meta-analysis methods available. We apply our methodology to synthetic data and neuroimaging meta-analysis datasets.

Indexed as

Bayes TheoremLatent Class AnalysisMeta-Analysis as TopicModels, StatisticalSpatial RegressionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimagingPrincipal Component AnalysisStochastic ProcessesBayesian modelingFactor analysisFunctional principal component analysisMeta-analysisReverse inferenceSpatial point pattern data

Identifiers

PMID28498564
PMCPMC5682245

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.