Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28498427›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of oncology2017

Effect of macrophages on breast cancer cell proliferation, and on expression of hormone receptors, uPAR and HER-2.

Therése Lindsten, Alexander Hedbrant, Anna Ramberg, Jonny Wijkander, Anja Solterbeck, Margareta Eriksson, Dick Delbro, Ann Erlandsson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Macrophage subtypes inhibit breast cancer proliferation in culture.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Therése LindstenDepartment of Clinical Pathology and Cytology, Central Hospital Karlstad, SE-651 88 Karlstad, Sweden.
Alexander HedbrantSchool of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, SE-702 81 Örebro, Sweden.
Anna RambergDepartment of Clinical Pathology and Cytology, Central Hospital Karlstad, SE-651 88 Karlstad, Sweden.
Jonny WijkanderDepartment of Health Sciences, Karlstad University, SE-651 88 Karlstad, Sweden.
Anja SolterbeckDepartment of Clinical Pathology and Cytology, Central Hospital Karlstad, SE-651 88 Karlstad, Sweden.
Margareta ErikssonDepartment of Clinical Pathology and Cytology, Central Hospital Karlstad, SE-651 88 Karlstad, Sweden.
Dick DelbroSchool of Medical Sciences, Örebro University, SE-702 81 Örebro, Sweden.
Ann ErlandssonDepartment of Environmental and Life Sciences/Biology, Karlstad University, SE-651 88 Karlstad, Sweden.
Karlstad Central Hospital · SEKarlstad University · SEÖrebro University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Malignant tumors, including breast cancers, are frequently infiltrated with innate immune cells and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) represent the major inflammatory component in stroma of many tumors. In this study, we examined the immunoreactivity of the macrophage markers CD68 and CD163 as well as the hormone receptors estrogen receptor α (ERα), progesterone receptor (PR), estrogen receptor β1 (ERβ1), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP‑9), urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) and the proliferations marker Ki67 in 17 breast cancer biopsies. The quantitative score for CD68+ and CD163+ strongly indicate M2 phenotype dominance in the currently investigated biopsies. We found that an increasing level of macrophages was negatively associated with ERα or PR, whereas a positive association was observed for Ki-67 or uPAR. No significant association could be seen between the level of macrophage and HER-2, ERβ1 or MMP-9 expression. Effect of conditioned media (CM) generated from cultured human M1 and M2 macrophage phenotypes were investigated on the proliferation and expression of selected markers in the T47D breast cancer cell line. We found that in contrast to the in vivo situation, in particularly the CM from M1 macrophages decreased the growth and Ki67 expression in T47D, and significantly increased ERβ1 mRNA levels. Moreover, in accordance to the in vivo situation the CM from the macrophages decreased the expression of ERα protein as well as ERα or PR mRNA. In conclusion our results show that macrophages alone have the capability to decrease the tumor cell expression of ERα and PR in vitro. In the tumor environment in vivo macrophages also contribute to an increase in tumor cell expression of uPAR and Ki67, suggesting that macrophages are involved in impairing the prognosis for breast cancer patients.

Indexed as

ApoptosisBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCell ProliferationErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleHumansMatrix Metalloproteinase 9PrognosisReceptors, ProgesteroneReceptors, Urokinase Plasminogen ActivatorSignal TransductionTumor Cells, CulturedBiomarkers, TumorERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstrogen Receptor alphaMatrix Metalloproteinase 9MMP9 protein, humanReceptors, ProgesteroneReceptors, Urokinase Plasminogen Activator

Identifiers

PMID28498427
PMCPMC5467790
OpenAlexW2612766149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.