Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28497993›Full record

ArticleChildhood obesity (Print)2017

Personal Variation in Preference for Sweetness: Effects of Age and Obesity.

Nuala Bobowski, Julie A Mennella

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Childhood obesity (Print), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03627351 (Taste of Medicines for Children), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03627351 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Taste of Medicines for Children: Genetic Variation and Medical Adherence (Aim 1)

TypeobservationalSponsorMonell Chemical Senses CenterRan2018 to 2024Enrolled154ConditionsHealthy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nuala Bobowski1 Monell Chemical Senses Center , Philadelphia, PA.
Julie A Mennella1 Monell Chemical Senses Center , Philadelphia, PA.
Monell Chemical Senses Center · USSt. Catherine University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUse of nonnutritive sweeteners (NNSs), which provide sweet taste with few to no calories, has increased, but data on whether children's hedonic responses to NNSs differ from nutritive sugars or from adults' hedonic responses are limited.

methodsMost preferred levels of sucrose and the NNS sucralose were determined via a forced-choice tracking procedure in 48 children, 7-14 years (mean = 10 years), and 34 adults. Each participant also rated the liking of these taste stimuli, as well as varying concentrations of aspartame on 3- and 5-point facial hedonic scales. Anthropometric measures were obtained, and motives for palatable food intake were assessed with the Palatable Eating Motives Scale (PEMS, adults) and Kids PEMS.

resultsWhile use of the 3-point scale showed no age-related differences in liking of sweeteners, the 5-point scale showed that more children than adults liked higher concentrations of sucrose, sucralose, and aspartame, and the tracking procedure showed that children most preferred higher concentrations of sucrose and sucralose than adults. Regardless of age, sweet preference did not differ between obese and nonobese participants and showed no association with motives for eating palatable foods. Children's body mass index z-scores were positively associated with social and conformity motive scores for eating palatable foods.

conclusionResearch should move beyond measures of variation in sweet taste hedonics to include identifying motives, and the physiological and psychological consequences of eating sweets, to shed light on what children are more vulnerable to develop unfavorable eating habits, increasing risk for obesity, and other diseases.

Indexed as

Age FactorsSweetening AgentsAdolescentAdultAspartameBody Mass IndexChildEatingFeeding BehaviorFemaleFood PreferencesHumansMaleObesityPediatric ObesityRisk FactorsAspartameSucroseSweetening Agentstrichlorosucrosechildrennonnutritive sweetenerobesitypreferencesucrosetaste

Identifiers

PMID28497993
PMCPMC5647502
OpenAlexW2612136551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.