Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28497848›Full record

ArticleAnimal genetics2017

Isolation of subtelomeric sequences of porcine chromosomes for translocation screening reveals errors in the pig genome assembly.

R E O'Connor, G Fonseka, R Frodsham, A L Archibald, M Lawrie, G A Walling, D K Griffin

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Clinical Cytogenetics of the Dog: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Corrigendum.Animal genetics · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

R E O'ConnorSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7AF, UK.
G FonsekaCytocell Ltd, Newmarket Road, Cambridge, UK.
R FrodshamCytocell Ltd, Newmarket Road, Cambridge, UK.
A L ArchibaldThe Roslin Institute, R(D)SVS, University of Edinburgh, Division of Genetics and Genomics, Easter Bush, Midlothian, EH25 9RG, UK.
M LawrieCytocell Ltd, Newmarket Road, Cambridge, UK.
G A WallingJSR Genetics, Southburn, Driffield, North Humberside, YO25 9ED, UK.
D K GriffinSchool of Biosciences, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7AF, UK.
Newmarket Equine Hospital · GBUniversity of Kent · GBGenomics (United Kingdom) · GBJSR Farming (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20211550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Balanced chromosomal aberrations have been shown to affect fertility in most species studied, often leading to hypoprolificacy (reduced litter size) in domestic animals such as pigs. With an increasing emphasis in modern food production on the use of a small population of high quality males for artificial insemination, the potential economic and environmental costs of hypoprolific boars, bulls, rams etc. are considerable. There is therefore a need for novel tools to facilitate rapid, cost-effective chromosome translocation screening. This has previously been achieved by standard karyotype analysis; however, this approach relies on a significant level of expertise and is limited in its ability to identify subtle, cryptic translocations. To address this problem, we developed a novel device and protocol for translocation screening using subtelomeric probes and fluorescence in situ hybridisation. Probes were designed using BACs (bacterial artificial chromosomes) from the subtelomeric region of the short (p-arm) and long (q-arm) of each porcine chromosome. They were directly labelled with FITC or Texas Red (p-arm and q-arm respectively) prior to application of a 'Multiprobe' device, thereby enabling simultaneous detection of each individual porcine chromosome on a single slide. Initial experiments designed to isolate BACs in subtelomeric regions led to the discovery of a series of incorrectly mapped regions in the porcine genome assembly (from a total of 82 BACs, only 45 BACs mapped correctly). Our work therefore highlights the importance of accurate physical mapping of newly sequenced genomes. The system herein described allows for robust and comprehensive analysis of the porcine karyotype, an adjunct to classical cytogenetics that provides a valuable tool to expedite efficient, cost effective food production.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingTranslocation, GeneticAnimalsChromosomes, Artificial, BacterialDNA ProbesGenomeIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypeMaleSus scrofaTelomereDNA Probesbacterial artificial chromosomefood productionhypoprolificacykaryotype

Identifiers

PMID28497848
PMCPMC5518436
OpenAlexW2613339742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.