Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28497567›Full record

ArticleHuman mutation2017

Determination of disease phenotypes and pathogenic variants from exome sequence data in the CAGI 4 gene panel challenge.

Kunal Kundu, Lipika R Pal, Yizhou Yin, John Moult

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human mutation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Reduced penetrance of pathogenic ACMG variants in a deeply phenotyped cohort study and evaluation of ClinVar classification over time.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kunal KunduInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland.
Lipika R PalInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland.
Yizhou YinInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland.
John MoultInstitute for Bioscience and Biotechnology Research, University of Maryland, Rockville, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-3012-2282

Funding

Component 2 - Resource ProjectU41HG007346 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BRENNER, STEVEN E · 2015 to 2017
$1.7M
Mechanisms underlying complex trait human diseaseR01GM104436 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MOULT, JOHN · 2013 to 2016
$1.1M
Molecular impact of mutations in monogenic disease and cancerR01GM120364 · NIGMS · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI MOULT, JOHN · 2016 to 2018
$1.1M
Critical Assessment of Genome Interpretation ConferenceR13HG006650 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI BRENNER, STEVEN E · 2011 to 2018
$165k
NHGRI NIH HHS R13 HG006650NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG007346NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104436NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of gene panel sequence for diagnostic and prognostic testing is now widespread, but there are so far few objective tests of methods to interpret these data. We describe the design and implementation of a gene panel sequencing data analysis pipeline (VarP) and its assessment in a CAGI4 community experiment. The method was applied to clinical gene panel sequencing data of 106 patients, with the goal of determining which of 14 disease classes each patient has and the corresponding causative variant(s). The disease class was correctly identified for 36 cases, including 10 where the original clinical pipeline did not find causative variants. For a further seven cases, we found strong evidence of an alternative disease to that tested. Many of the potentially causative variants are missense, with no previous association with disease, and these proved the hardest to correctly assign pathogenicity or otherwise. Post analysis showed that three-dimensional structure data could have helped for up to half of these cases. Over-reliance on HGMD annotation led to a number of incorrect disease assignments. We used a largely ad hoc method to assign probabilities of pathogenicity for each variant, and there is much work still to be done in this area.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticDiseaseExome SequencingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansModels, MolecularMutation, MissensePhenotypeProteinsProteinsCAGIgene panel sequencingmissense mutationsmonogenic diseaseVarP analysis pipeline

Identifiers

PMID28497567
PMCPMC5576720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.