ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2017
Elucidating and engineering thiopeptide biosynthesis.
Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- De novo design of ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides.Nature chemistry · 2025Article
- Micrococcin cysteine-to-thiazole conversion through transient interactions between the scaffolding protein TclI and the modification enzymes TclJ and TclN.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2024Article
- Demystifying Bacteriocins of Human Microbiota by Genome Guided Prospects: An Impetus to Rekindle the Antimicrobial Research.Current protein & peptide science · 2022Review
- Thiopeptides encoding biosynthetic gene clusters mined from bacterial genomes.Journal of biosciences · 2021Article
- Overview of Global Trends in Classification, Methods of Preparation and Application of Bacteriocins.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Initially discovered in the mid-twentieth century, thiopeptides constitute a diverse family of bacterially produced natural products exhibiting a remarkable array of biological properties. Only in the last several years have the details of thiopeptide biosynthesis been uncovered by a combination of genomic, genetic, and biochemical approaches. Thiopeptides are now known to be ribosomally synthesized and subsequently densely modified to carry azol(in)es, dehydro amino acids, and various other pathway-specific decorations. The defining feature of thiopeptides is a central six-membered nitrogenous ring that constrains peptide macrocycles of varying sequences and sizes. Recent landmark studies have defined the precisely orchestrated posttranslational modification cascade culminating in thiopeptide product formation. Because diverse thiopeptides are processed by a relatively small number of well-conserved enzymes, it has been suggested that artificial diversification of the precursor peptide could allow a vast new chemical space to be explored for clinically important activities. The success of this strategy depends on the plasticity of thiopeptide processing machinery, an open question that warrants further investigation. There is an urgent need therefore to leverage established thiopeptide research platforms to investigate substrate-enzyme specificity and devise intelligent diversification strategies for library generation. Meanwhile, the distinct genomic signatures of conserved thiopeptide-associated genes will enable the continued mining of nature for novel compounds and processing enzymes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28497389What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.