ReviewDer Unfallchirurg2017
[(Partial) fusion of the wrist : Indications and surgical procedures].
Review in Der Unfallchirurg, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conservative and surgical treatment of wrist osteoarthritis: a systematic review.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026Pooled it
- [Osteoarthritis of the wrist].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- A Systematic Review of Radiolunate and Radioscapholunate Arthrodesis.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2021Article
- [Joint arthrodesis in functionally favorable position : Considerations on measurement of disability in private accident insurance].Der Unfallchirurg · 2020Review
- [Revision surgery after total wrist arthroplasty].Der Orthopade · 2020Review
- [Revision surgery after failed (partial-) arthrodesis of the wrist].Der Orthopade · 2020Review
- [Total wrist arthroplasty-a review].Der Orthopade · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Carpal bone fusions for secondary reconstruction are still indispensable despite state of the art diagnostic tools and modern treatment techniques for wrist lesions. The former fusions stabilize the wrist and enable sufficient residual carpal mobility. Pain can be reduced significantly by arthrodesis of destroyed joints and the progress of osteoarthritis may be stopped or delayed. This review presents commonly used fusions with their inherent indications, contraindications and complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.