ArticleDer Anaesthesist2017
[New Sepsis-3 definition : Do we have to treat sepsis before we can diagnose it from now on?]
Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thirty-five years of evolving inflammatory paradigms in sepsis (1991-2025): a comprehensive mapping of immune dysregulation research, anti-inflammatory targets, and translational barriers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Prospective evaluation of the quickSOFA score as a screening for sepsis in the emergency department.Internal and emergency medicine · 2020Article
- Article
- [Evidence-based interdisciplinary treatment of abdominal sepsis].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2019Review
- Bacterial sepsis : Diagnostics and calculated antibiotic therapy.Der Anaesthesist · 2019Review
- [Sepsis detection in emergency medicine : Results of an interprofessional survey on sepsis detection in prehospital emergency medicine and emergency departments].Der Anaesthesist · 2018Article
- [Chameleon spondylodiscitis : Challenge for geriatricians].Der Nervenarzt · 2018Article
- [Bacterial sepsis : Diagnostics and calculated antibiotic therapy].Der Anaesthesist · 2017Review
- [Chameleon spondylodiscitis : Challenge for geriatricians].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3) have been available since the beginning of 2016. SEPSIS-3 completely replaces the old SIRS criteria in the definition of sepsis and defines sepsis from now on as "life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection". However, it seems questionable whether in clinical practice the new definition is really superior to the old one. The most important question is the following: Is it helpful to have a definition that first recognizes a patient once organ dysfunction has occurred and the patient already needs intensive care?
Indexed as
Identifiers
28497242What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.