Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28497219›Full record

ReviewUpdates in surgery2017

Robot-assisted adrenalectomy: indications and drawbacks.

C Nomine-Criqui, A Germain, A Ayav, L Bresler, L Brunaud

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Updates in surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C Nomine-CriquiDepartment of Digestive, Hepatobiliary, Endocrine, and Oncology Surgery, University of Lorraine, CHU Nancy-Brabois (Adultes), 54511, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France. c.nomine-criqui@chru-nancy.fr.
A GermainDepartment of Digestive, Hepatobiliary, Endocrine, and Oncology Surgery, University of Lorraine, CHU Nancy-Brabois (Adultes), 54511, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France.
A AyavDepartment of Digestive, Hepatobiliary, Endocrine, and Oncology Surgery, University of Lorraine, CHU Nancy-Brabois (Adultes), 54511, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France.
L BreslerDepartment of Digestive, Hepatobiliary, Endocrine, and Oncology Surgery, University of Lorraine, CHU Nancy-Brabois (Adultes), 54511, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France.
L BrunaudDepartment of Digestive, Hepatobiliary, Endocrine, and Oncology Surgery, University of Lorraine, CHU Nancy-Brabois (Adultes), 54511, Vandoeuvre-Les-Nancy, France.
Université de Lorraine · FRCentre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adrenal tumors can vary from a benign adrenocortical adenoma with no hormonal secretion to a secretory adrenocortical malignancy (adrenocortical carcinoma) or a hormone-secreting tumor of the adrenal medulla (pheochromocytoma). Currently, laparoscopic adrenalectomy is regarded as the preferred surgical approach for the management of most adrenal surgical disorders, although there are no prospective randomized trials comparing this technique with open adrenalectomy. However, widespread adoption of robotic technology has positioned robotic adrenalectomy as an option in some medical centers. Speculative advantages associated with the use of the robotic system have rarely been evaluated in clinical settings and cost increase remains an important drawback associated with robotic surgery. This review summarizes current available data regarding robotic transperitoneal adrenalectomy including its indications, advantages, limitations, and comparison with conventional laparoscopic adrenalectomy. We believe that the use of a robotic system seems to be useful especially in more difficult patients with larger tumors, truncal paragangliomas, and bilateral and/or partial adrenalectomies. Overall, we believe that overcosts due to robotic system use could be balanced by hospital stay decrease, patients' referral increase, improved postoperative outcomes in more difficult patients and ergonomics for the surgeon. However, we also believe that the current surgical intuitive business model is counterproductive, because there are no available strong clinical data that could balance overcosts associated with the use of the robotic system.

Indexed as

AdrenalectomyAdrenal Gland NeoplasmsHumansLaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdrenalectomyAdrenal glandsLaparoscopyPheochromocytomaRoboticsTelerobotics

Identifiers

PMID28497219
OpenAlexW2612765959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.