Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28497166›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2017

Biomechanical evaluation of straight antegrade nailing in proximal humeral fractures: the rationale of the "proximal anchoring point".

Simon A Euler, Maximilian Petri, Melanie B Venderley, Grant J Dornan, Werner Schmoelz, Travis Lee Turnbull, Michael Plecko, Franz S Kralinger, Peter J Millett

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Novel CT-based simulation reveals anterolateral surgical approach avoids acromial collision in antegrade humeral nailing.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Simon A EulerDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Sports Traumatology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. simon.euler@tirol-kliniken.at.
Maximilian PetriThe Steadman Clinic, 181 West Meadow Drive, Suite 400, Vail, CO, 81657, USA.
Melanie B VenderleySteadman Philippon Research Institute, 181 West Meadow Drive, Suite 1000, Vail, CO, 81657, USA.
Grant J DornanSteadman Philippon Research Institute, 181 West Meadow Drive, Suite 1000, Vail, CO, 81657, USA.
Werner SchmoelzDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Sports Traumatology, Medical University Innsbruck, Anichstr. 35, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Travis Lee TurnbullSteadman Philippon Research Institute, 181 West Meadow Drive, Suite 1000, Vail, CO, 81657, USA.
Michael PleckoUnfallkrankenhaus Graz, Göstinger Str. 24, 8020, Graz, Austria.
Franz S KralingerDepartment of Trauma Surgery, Wilhelminenspital, Montlearstr. 37, 1160, Vienna, Austria.
Peter J MillettThe Steadman Clinic, 181 West Meadow Drive, Suite 400, Vail, CO, 81657, USA.
Steadman Philippon Research Institute · USInnsbruck Medical University · ATMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUnfallkrankenhaus Salzburg · ATWilhelminen Hospital · AT

Funding

DePuy Synthes 13515
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeVarus failure is one of the most common failure modes following surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Straight antegrade nails (SAN) theoretically provide increased stability by anchoring to the densest zone of the proximal humerus (subchondral zone) with the end of the nail. The aim of this study was to biomechanically investigate the characteristics of this "proximal anchoring point" (PAP). We hypothesized that the PAP would improve stability compared to the same construct without the PAP.

methodsStraight antegrade humeral nailing was performed in 20 matched pairs of human cadaveric humeri for a simulated unstable two-part fracture.

resultsBiomechanical testing, with stepwise increasing cyclic axial loading (50-N increments each 100 cycles) at an angle of 20° abduction revealed significantly higher median loads to failure for SAN constructs with the PAP (median, 450 N; range, 200-1.000 N) compared to those without the PAP (median, 325 N; range, 100-500 N; p = 0.009). SAN constructs with press-fit proximal extensions (endcaps) showed similar median loads to failure (median, 400 N; range, 200-650 N), when compared to the undersized, commercially available SAN endcaps (median, 450 N; range, 200-600 N; p = 0.240).

conclusionsThe PAP provided significantly increased stability in SAN constructs compared to the same setup without this additional proximal anchoring point. Varus-displacing forces to the humeral head were superiorly reduced in this setting. This study provides biomechanical evidence for the "proximal anchoring point's" rationale. Straight antegrade humeral nailing may be beneficial for patients undergoing surgical treatment for unstable proximal humeral fractures to decrease secondary varus displacement and thus potentially reduce revision rates.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiomechanical PhenomenaBone NailsCadaverFemaleFracture DislocationFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryHumansHumeral HeadMaleShoulder FracturesHumeral fractureProximal anchoring pointStabilityStraight antegrade nails

Identifiers

PMID28497166
OpenAlexW2613892942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.