ArticleEpilepsia open2016
Not all that glitters is gold: A guide to critical appraisal of animal drug trials in epilepsy.
Article in Epilepsia open, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- MRI-Guided Electrode Implantation for Chronic Intracerebral Recordings in a Rat Model of Post-Traumatic Epilepsy-Challenges and Gains.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- Article
- Evaluation of subchronic administration of antiseizure drugs in spontaneously seizing rats.Epilepsia · 2020Article
- Harmonization of the pipeline for seizure detection to phenotype post-traumatic epilepsy in a preclinical multicenter study on post-traumatic epileptogenesis.Epilepsy research · 2019Article
- In search of antiepileptogenic treatments for post-traumatic epilepsy.Neurobiology of disease · 2019Review
- Neuroinflammation in epileptogenesis: Insights and translational perspectives from new models of epilepsy.Epilepsia · 2017Article
- Preclinical Screening for Treatments for Infantile Spasms in the Multiple Hit Rat Model of Infantile Spasms: An Update.Neurochemical research · 2017Article
- Inflammation in Epileptic Encephalopathies.Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Preclinical studies have produced numerous drugs with antiseizure properties which currently are the standard of care in clinical care. A third of the human population with epilepsy still continues having seizures despite the ongoing discoveries. The recognized clinical gaps of care that need to be addressed are the identification of antiepileptogenic and disease modifying treatments, treatments for refractory seizures or for seizures and epilepsies with limited or unsatisfactory treatments, such as early life epileptic encephalopathies. In this invited review, we provide a historical summary of the international efforts to re-evaluate the strategies adopted in preclinical epilepsy therapy discovery studies. We discuss issues that may impact the quality, interpretation and validation of preclinical studies and their translation to successful therapies for humans affected with epilepsy. These include the selection of animal models and the study design, research practices that affect rigor, such as appropriate use of statistics and reporting of study methods and results, their validation across models, labs and preclinical-clinical studies, the need to harmonize research methods and outcome assessment, and the importance to improve translation to clinically appropriate situations. The epilepsy research community is incrementally adopting collaborative research, including consortia or multicenter studies to meet these needs. Improving the infrastructure that can support these efforts will be instrumental in the future success.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.