ArticleBioMed research international2017
Numerical Evaluation of Image Contrast for Thicker and Thinner Objects among Current Intraoral Digital Imaging Systems.
Article in BioMed research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of automatic exposure compensation tool of digital radiographic systems on the diagnosis of periapical lesions in teeth restored with metal post.Oral radiology · 2026Article
- Automatic exposure compensation in intraoral digital radiography: effect on the gray values of dental tissues.BMC medical imaging · 2022Article
- Benefits of using a photostimulable phosphor plate protective device.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2021Article
- A Novel Phantom and a Dedicated Developed Software for Image Quality Controls in X-Ray Intraoral Devices.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2021Article
- Effect of differences in pixel size on image characteristics of digital intraoral radiographic systems: a physical and visual evaluation.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2020Article
- Can a high-density dental material affect the automatic exposure compensation of digital radiographic images?Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2019Article
- Repeat analysis of intraoral digital imaging performed by undergraduate students using a complementary metal oxide semiconductor sensor: An institutional case study.Imaging science in dentistry · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose is to evaluate the performance of current intraoral digital detectors in detail using a precise phantom and new method. Two aluminum step wedges in 0.5 mm steps were exposed by two photostimulable phosphor plate (PSP) systems-one with automatic exposure compensation (AEC) and the other without AEC-and a CCD sensor. Images were obtained with 3 doses at 60 kV. The effect of metallic material also was evaluated. The contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) for thinner steps and the low contrast value (LCV) for thicker steps were obtained. The CCD system was the best under all conditions (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.