Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28497042›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2017

Scientific Evidence for Different Options for GDM Screening and Management: Controversies and Review of the Literature.

Claudia Caissutti, Vincenzo Berghella

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03527537 (Gestational Diabetes and Pharmacotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03527537 phase4active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Gestational Diabetes and Pharmacotherapy (GAP) - A Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Timing of Pharmacotherapy Initiation for Patients With Gestational Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorMedical College of WisconsinRan2021 to 2026Enrolled416ConditionsGestational DiabetesArmsInsulin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Claudia CaissuttiDepartment of Experimental Clinical and Medical Science, DISM, Clinic of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Udine, Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6535-4497
Vincenzo BerghellaDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2854-0239

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID28497042
PMCPMC5402236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.