Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28497029›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2017

Reciprocal Interactions between Nematodes and Their Microbial Environments.

Ankur Midha, Josephine Schlosser, Susanne Hartmann

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Detangling the Crosstalk BetweenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ankur MidhaDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Immunology, Freie Universität BerlinBerlin, Germany.
Josephine SchlosserDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Immunology, Freie Universität BerlinBerlin, Germany.
Susanne HartmannDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Immunology, Freie Universität BerlinBerlin, Germany.
Freie Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parasitic nematode infections are widespread in nature, affecting humans as well as wild, companion, and livestock animals. Most parasitic nematodes inhabit the intestines of their hosts living in close contact with the intestinal microbiota. Many species also have tissue migratory life stages in the absence of severe systemic inflammation of the host. Despite the close coexistence of helminths with numerous microbes, little is known concerning these interactions. While the environmental niche is considerably different, the free-living nematode

Indexed as

Environmental MicrobiologyAnimalsBacterial Physiological PhenomenaBiodiversityCaenorhabditis elegansDrug Resistance, MicrobialFecesGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHelminthiasisHelminthsHost-Parasite InteractionsHumansIntestinesModels, BiologicalNematodaSignal Transductionantibiotic resistanceantimicrobial peptideshelminthmicrobiotanematode

Identifiers

PMID28497029
PMCPMC5406411
OpenAlexW2609016858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.