ReviewGland surgery2017
How to prevent complications in breast augmentation.
Review in Gland surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Computational Framework for Investigating the Mechanical Stresses on Breast Implants Under Dynamic Loading Conditions.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Article
- Assessment of Risk Factors for Rupture in Breast Reconstruction Patients with Macrotextured Breast Implants.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2023Observational
- High-Resolution Ultrasound-Assisted Assessment of Preliminary Short-term Safety Outcomes of an Implant-Based Augmentation Mammaplasty Using a Bioengineered, Cell-Friendly, Smooth-Surface Device in Korean Females.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2022Article
- A Preliminary Retrospective Study to Assess the Short-Term Safety of Traditional Smooth or Microtextured Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants in Korea.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2021Observational
- Intraoperative Assessment of Endogenous Microbiota in the Breast.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2021Article
- Four-Year Interim Results of the Safety of Augmentation Mammaplasty Using the Motiva Ergonomix™ Round SilkSurface: A Multicenter, Retrospective Study.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2021Article
- Safety and Effectiveness of Silicone Gel-Filled Breast Implants in Primary Augmentation Patients.Aesthetic surgery journal · 2021Article
- Controllable Factors to Reduce the Rate of Complications in Primary Breast Augmentation: A Review of the Literature.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2021Review
- Short-term Safety of Augmentation Mammaplasty Using the BellaGel Implants in Korean Women.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2019Article
- Immunophenotypic characterization of human T cells after in vitro exposure to different silicone breast implant surfaces.PloS one · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
No high-level evidences about the best technique or the best implant to use for obtaining the best outcomes in aesthetic breast augmentation, with low complications and re-interventions rates exist from available literature. In this paper we present the actual best evidence about the etiopathogenesis of main complications in aesthetic breast augmentation, identifying some basic rules to follow in order to reduce complication rates in our daily activity, minimizing re-interventions, obtaining long lasting results and high women's satisfaction levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.