ArticleJournal of pediatric genetics2017
Genomic Microarray in Intellectual Disability: The Usefulness of Existing Systems in the Interpretation of Copy Number Variation.
Article in Journal of pediatric genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Chromosomal Microarray Analysis in Children with Unexplained Developmental Delay/Intellectual Disability.Journal of pediatric genetics · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whole genome array technology is an essential tool for the detection of a large number of copy number variants (CNVs) in patients with ID and/or multiple congenital anomalies. However, the clinical significance of some microimbalances is not known. In this article, we succeeded to detect seven new variations of unknown significance (dup12p13.33, dup2p16.3, dupXq13.2, del12q24.33, dup16p13.11, trip4q22.1, and dup9p21.3), one CNV classified as known pathogenic syndrome (del22q13.31-q33), and one CNV classified as potentially pathogenic (del11q24.3). We emphasize the role of comparative genomic hybridization arrays in the investigation of intellectual disability and evaluate the usefulness of existing systems in the interpretation of CNVs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.