ReviewJournal of atrial fibrillation
Echocardiography In the Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence: A Review.
Review in Journal of atrial fibrillation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Chemotherapy Related Cardiotoxicity Evaluation-A Contemporary Review with a Focus on Cardiac Imaging.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Deep learning evaluation of echocardiograms to identify occult atrial fibrillation.NPJ digital medicine · 2024Article
- Anticoagulating New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation After COVID-19: A Single-Center Experience.Cureus · 2024Article
- The Use of Artificial Intelligence for Detecting and Predicting Atrial Arrhythmias Post Catheter Ablation.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Review
- Early Echocardiographic Predictors for Atrial Fibrillation Propensity: The Left Atrium Oracle.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Prediction of Atrial Fibrillation Using Machine Learning: A Review.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Review
- A Long Atrial Electromechanical Interval is Associated with Arrhythmic Recurrence after Catheter Ablation: How to Find What Has Been Lost.Journal of cardiovascular echographyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a very common sustained arrhythmia. Co-morbidities and age signifi cantly accelerate the progression of AF to persistent and permanent forms and the development of complications. The rate of AF recurrence is 10% in the first year after the initial diagnosis (25-50% in the first month after restoration of sinus rhythm) and about 5% per annum thereafter. Left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction degree has been associated with new-onset AF and in the last few years many new parameters to evaluate diastolic function were introduced and validated, even in patients with AF. Aim of this review was to summarize echocardiographic parameters, focusing on new tools, to evaluate patients with AF and to explore the role of echocardiographic evaluation to predict recurrence of the arrhythmia.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.