Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28496363›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer (Dove Medical Press)2017

Prognostic value of histone chaperone FACT subunits expression in breast cancer.

Kristopher Attwood, Daria Fleyshman, Laura Prendergast, Geraldine Paszkiewicz, Angela R Omilian, Wiam Bshara, Katerina Gurova

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. SSRP1 Is a Prognostic Biomarker Correlated with CD8BioMed research international · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristopher AttwoodDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics.
Daria FleyshmanDepartment of Cell Stress Biology.
Laura PrendergastDepartment of Cell Stress Biology.
Geraldine PaszkiewiczDepartment of Cell Stress Biology.
Angela R OmilianDepartment of Pathology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Wiam BsharaDepartment of Pathology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Katerina GurovaDepartment of Cell Stress Biology.
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · US

Funding

Modulation of cancer specific transcriptional factors with small moleculesR01CA197967 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI GUROVA, KATERINA V · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
Safety and anti-cancer efficacy of FACT inactivation in miceR21CA198395 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI GUROVA, KATERINA V · 2015 to 2016
$420k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197967NCI NIH HHS R21 CA198395
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the underlying reasons for tumor aggressiveness, such as why some tumors grow slowly and locally, while others rapidly progress to a lethal metastatic disease, is still limited. This is especially critical in breast cancer (BrCa) due to its high prevalence and also due to the possibility that it can be detected early. Several oncogenes and tumor suppressors have been identified and are used in the prognosis and treatment of BrCa. However, even with these markers, the outcome within BrCa subtypes is highly variable. Chromatin organization has long been acknowledged as a factor that plays an important role in tumor progression, but molecular mechanisms defining chromatin dynamics are largely missing. We have recently found that histone chaperone FACT (facilitates chromatin transcription) is overexpressed in ~18-20% of BrCa cases. FACT is elevated upon transformation of mammary epithelial cells and is essential for viability of tumor cells. BrCa cells with high FACT have a more aggressive transcriptional program than those with low FACT cells. Based on this we propose that FACT may be a marker of aggressive BrCa. In this study, we aimed to comprehensively characterize the pattern of FACT expression in BrCa in relation to other molecular and clinical prognostic markers. We developed and tested an assay for the detection and quantitation of protein levels of both FACT subunits, SSRP1, and SPT16, in clinical samples. We compared the value of mRNA and protein as potential markers of disease aggressiveness using a large cohort of patients (n=1092). We demonstrated that only SSRP1 immunohistochemical staining is a reliable indicator of FACT levels in tumor samples. High SSRP1 correlated with known markers of poor prognosis, such as negative hormone receptor status, presence of Her2, high-grade tumors, and tumors of later clinical stage. At the same time, no strong correlation between SSRP1 expression and survival was detected when all samples were analyzed together. Clear trend toward longer survival of patients with low or no SSRP1 expression in tumor samples was seen in several subgroups of patients, and most importantly significant association of high SSRP1 expression with shorter disease-free survival was detected in patients with early-stage and low-grade BrCa, the category of patients with the highest demand in predictive marker of disease progression.

Indexed as

breast cancerpredictive markerprognosisSPT16SSRP1

Identifiers

PMID28496363
PMCPMC5422336
OpenAlexW2611608435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.