ArticlePatient preference and adherence2017
Patient satisfaction with fixed-combination bimatoprost/timolol ophthalmic solution: a survey study in patients with glaucoma in China.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient Preferences and Understanding of Glaucoma Treatment: A Nationwide Survey by the French Glaucoma Society.Advances in therapy · 2025Article
- Latanoprostene Bunod 0.024% Early Experience Program (LEEP): A Canadian Initiative for Open-Angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2025Article
- From Eye Care to Hair Growth: Bimatoprost.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Safety of Fixed-Combination Bimatoprost 0.03%/Timolol 0.5% Ophthalmic Solution at 6 Months in Chinese Patients with Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2023Article
- The use of fixed dose drug combinations for glaucoma in clinical settings: a retrospective, observational, single-centre study.International ophthalmology · 2022Observational
- European real-world data about the use of a new delivery system containing a preservative-free multi-dose glaucoma treatment.European journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- A novel ocular delivery of brinzolamide based on gellan gum: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.Drug design, development and therapy · 2018Article
- Efficacy and safety of fixed-combination bimatoprost/timolol ophthalmic solution.Patient preference and adherence · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPoor adherence to treatment is a problem in glaucoma, and patient dissatisfaction with topical glaucoma medication is a barrier to adherence. The objective of this study was to evaluate glaucoma patients' satisfaction with fixed-combination bimatoprost/timolol ophthalmic solution (BTFC).
methodsThis observational, multicenter study was conducted in China in adults with glaucoma treated with BTFC for 1-3 months. Five hundred patients answered a questionnaire concerning their demographic characteristics, history of glaucoma and topical glaucoma treatment, and use of BTFC. The primary endpoint was patient satisfaction with BTFC assessed on a 10-point scale (1= very dissatisfied, 10= very satisfied).
resultsPatients received BTFC alone (65%) or with other treatments (35%), most commonly a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor. Most patients (87%) used BTFC as a replacement for other medication, usually a β-blocker or prostaglandin analog; 13% received BTFC as add-on treatment. Key reasons for initiating BTFC therapy were poor efficacy of previous treatment (72% of patients) and side effects of previous treatment (32% of patients). Most patients agreed or very much agreed that BTFC provided better control of intraocular pressure (85% of patients), had a simpler administration (87% of patients), and was associated with better tolerance and comfort (82% of patients) compared with their previous treatment. Mean satisfaction scores were significantly higher for BTFC than for previous treatments among all patients (7.8 versus 6.0;
conclusionPatients were highly satisfied with BTFC used alone or concomitantly with another topical medication. Patients previously treated with a β-blocker, prostaglandin analog, carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, α-adrenergic agonist, or combination of two medications were more satisfied with BTFC than with their previous treatment. Most reported that intraocular pressure control, tolerability, and ease of administration improved with BTFC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.