Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28496154›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Young children copy cumulative technological design in the absence of action information.

E Reindl, I A Apperly, S R Beck, C Tennie

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Human cumulative culture and the exploitation of natural phenomena.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The evolution of high-fidelity social learning.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Birch tar production does not prove Neanderthal behavioral complexity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Naive, captive long-tailed macaques (Royal Society open science · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Innovation and social transmission in experimental micro-societies: exploring the scope of cumulative culture in young children.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

E ReindlUniversity of Birmingham, School of Psychology, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK. eva.reindl@live.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1594-1367
I A ApperlyUniversity of Birmingham, School of Psychology, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
S R BeckUniversity of Birmingham, School of Psychology, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
C TennieUniversity of Birmingham, School of Psychology, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ratchet effect - the accumulation of beneficial changes in cultural products beyond a level that individuals could reach on their own - is a topic of increasing interest. It is currently debated which social learning mechanisms allow for the generation and transmission of cumulative culture. This study focused on transmission, investigating whether 4- to 6-year-old children were able to copy cumulative technological design and whether they could do so without action information (emulation). We adapted the spaghetti tower task, previously used to test for accumulation of culture in human adults. A baseline condition established that the demonstrated tower design was beyond the innovation skills of individual children this age and so represented a culture-dependent product for them. There were 2 demonstration conditions: a full demonstration (actions plus (end-)results) and an endstate- demonstration (end-results only). Children in both demonstration conditions built taller towers than those in the baseline. Crucially, in both demonstration conditions some children also copied the demonstrated tower. We provide the first evidence that young children learn from, and that some of them even copy, cumulative technological design, and that - in line with some adult studies - action information is not always necessary to transmit culture-dependent traits.

Indexed as

CultureImitative BehaviorSocial BehaviorAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolCreativityFemaleHumansMaleTechnology

Identifiers

PMID28496154
PMCPMC5431834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.