ArticleScientific reports2017
Leveraging multiple genomic data to prioritize disease-causing indels from exome sequencing data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Predicting deleterious missense genetic variants via integrative supervised nonnegative matrix tri-factorization.Scientific reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The emergence of exome sequencing in recent years has enabled rapid and cost-effective detection of genetic variants in coding regions and offers a great opportunity to combine sequencing experiments with subsequent computational analysis for dissecting genetic basis of human inherited diseases. However, this strategy, though successful in practice, still faces such challenges as limited sample size and substantial number or diversity of candidate variants. To overcome these obstacles, researchers have been concentrated in the development of advanced computational methods and have recently achieved great progress for analysing single nucleotide variant. Nevertheless, it still remains unclear on how to analyse indels, another type of genetic variant that accounts for substantial proportion of known disease-causing variants. In this paper, we proposed an integrative method to effectively identify disease-causing indels from exome sequencing data. Specifically, we put forward a statistical method to combine five functional prediction scores, four genic association scores and a genic intolerance score to produce an integrated p-value, which could then be used for prioritizing candidate indels. We performed extensive simulation studies and demonstrated that our method achieved high accuracy in uncovering disease-causing indels. Our software is available at http://bioinfo.au.tsinghua.edu.cn/jianglab/IndelPrioritizer/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.