Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28495511›Full record

ArticleArchives of biochemistry and biophysics2017

Biomolecular NMR: Past and future.

John L Markley, William Milo Westler

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of biochemistry and biophysics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

John L MarkleyNational Magnetic Resonance Facility at Madison, Biochemistry Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA. Electronic address: jmarkley@wisc.edu.
William Milo WestlerNational Magnetic Resonance Facility at Madison, Biochemistry Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

Funding

TR&D 3: TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT FOR NMR STUDIES OF SMALL MOLECULES (METABOLOMICS, NATURAL PRODUCTS, METABOLITE-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS) pp.537-585 P41GM103399 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BUTCHER, SAMUEL E · 2012 to 2019
$9.4M
The BMRB as an evolving resource for biomolecular structure-function researchR01GM109046 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI HOCH, JEFFREY C · 2014 to 2022
$6.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103399NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM109046
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The editors of this special volume suggested this topic, presumably because of the perspective lent by our combined >90-year association with biomolecular NMR. What follows is our personal experience with the evolution of the field, which we hope will illustrate the trajectory of change over the years. As for the future, one can confidently predict that it will involve unexpected advances. Our narrative is colored by our experience in using the NMR Facility for Biomedical Studies at Carnegie-Mellon University (Pittsburgh) and in developing similar facilities at Purdue (1977-1984) and the University of Wisconsin-Madison (1984-). We have enjoyed developing NMR technology and making it available to collaborators and users of these facilities. Our group's association with the Biological Magnetic Resonance data Bank (BMRB) and with the Worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB) has also been rewarding. Of course, many groups contributed to the early growth and development of biomolecular NMR, and our brief personal account certainly omits many important milestones.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularUnited StatesBiomolecular NMR historyComputational approachesNMR instrumentationPulse sequence developmentSample preparation and labeling

Identifiers

PMID28495511
PMCPMC5701516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.