Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28495264›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Global health2017

Community engagement and integrated health and polio immunisation campaigns in conflict-affected areas of Pakistan: a cluster randomised controlled trial.

Muhammad Atif Habib, Sajid Soofi, Simon Cousens, Saeed Anwar, Najib Ul Haque, Imran Ahmed, Noshad Ali, Rehman Tahir, Zulfiqar A Bhutta

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Global health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01908114 (To Develop, Implement and Evaluate the Polio Demonstration Project Comprising of a Community Based Intervention Package for Polio Eradication in Pakistan), which is not on this map. Cited by 67 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01908114 phase4unknown statusnot on this map

To Develop, Implement and Evaluate the Polio Demonstration Project Comprising of a Community Based Intervention Package for Polio Eradication in Pakistan

TypeinterventionalSponsorAga Khan UniversityRan2013 to 2021Enrolled60,000ConditionsPolio, Polio Sero Conversion, Polio Sero Prevalence, Immunization CoverageArmsEnhanced Community mobilization, Combined Oral Polio Vaccine and Inject able Polio Vaccine during SIA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Muhammad Atif HabibCentre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sajid SoofiCentre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Simon CousensLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Saeed AnwarPeshawar Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Najib Ul HaquePeshawar Medical College, Peshawar, Pakistan.
Imran AhmedCentre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Noshad AliCentre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Rehman TahirTrust for Vaccines and Immunization, Karachi, Pakistan.
Zulfiqar A BhuttaCentre of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan; London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Centre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: zulfiqar.bhutta@aku.edu.
Aga Khan University · PKKhyber Medical College · PKLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBTrust for Vaccines & Immunization · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPakistan faces huge challenges in eradicating polio due to widespread poliovirus transmission and security challenges. Innovative interventions are urgently needed to strengthen community buy-in, to increase the coverage of oral polio vaccine (OPV) and other routine immunisations, and to enhance immunity through the introduction of inactivated polio vaccine (IPV) in combination with OPV. We aimed to evaluate the acceptability and effect on immunisation coverage of an integrated strategy for community engagement and maternal and child health immunisation campaigns in insecure and conflict-affected polio-endemic districts of Pakistan.

methodsWe did a community-based three-arm cluster randomised trial in healthy children aged 1 month to 5 years that resided within the study sites in three districts of Pakistan at high risk of polio. Clusters were randomly assigned by a computer algorithm using restricted randomisation in blocks of 20 by an external statistician (1:1:1) to receive routine polio programme activities (control, arm A), additional interventions with community outreach and mobilisation using an enhanced communication package and provision of short-term preventive maternal and child health services and routine immunisation (health camps), including OPV (arm B), or all interventions of arm B with additional provision of IPV delivered at the maternal and child health camps (arm C). An independent team conducted surveys at baseline, endline, and after each round of supplementary immunisation activity for acceptability and effect. The primary outcome measures for the study were coverage of OPV, IPV, and routine extended programme on immunisation vaccines and changes in the proportion of unvaccinated and fully vaccinated children. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01908114.

findingsBetween June 4, 2013, and May 31, 2014, 387 clusters were randomised (131 to arm A, 127 to arm B, and 129 to arm C). At baseline, 28 760 children younger than 5 years were recorded in arm A, 30 098 in arm B, and 29 126 in arm C. 359 clusters remained in the trial until the end (116 in arm A, 120 in arm B, and 123 in arm C; with 23 334 children younger than 5 years in arm A, 26 110 in arm B, and 25 745 in arm C). The estimated OPV coverage was 75% in arm A compared with 82% in arm B (difference vs arm A 6·6%; 95% CI 4·8-8·3) and 84% in arm C (8·5%, 6·8-10·1; overall p<0·0001). The mean proportion of routine vaccine doses received by children younger than 24 months of age was 43% in arm A, 52% in arm B (9%, 7-11) and 54% in arm C (11%, 9-13; overall p<0·0001). No serious adverse events requiring hospitalisation were reported after immunisation.

interpretationDespite the challenges associated with the polio end-game in high-risk, conflict-affected areas of Pakistan, a strategy of community mobilisation and targeted community-based health and immunisation camps during polio immunisation campaigns was successful in increasing vaccine coverage, including polio vaccine coverage.

fundingBill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationWarfareChild, PreschoolCluster AnalysisFemaleHealth PromotionHumansImmunizationInfantInfant, NewbornMalePakistanPoliomyelitisPoliovirus Vaccine, InactivatedPoliovirus Vaccine, OralPoliovirus Vaccine, InactivatedPoliovirus Vaccine, Oral

Identifiers

PMID28495264
PMCPMC5439031
OpenAlexW2613150879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.