Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28495001›Full record

ArticleComputer methods and programs in biomedicine2017

A comparison between swallowing sounds and vibrations in patients with dysphagia.

Faezeh Movahedi, Atsuko Kurosu, James L Coyle, Subashan Perera, Ervin Sejdić

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Faezeh MovahediDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Swanson School of Enginering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Atsuko KurosuDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
James L CoyleDepartment of Communication Science and Disorders, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Subashan PereraDepartment of Medicine, Division of Geriatric Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Ervin SejdićDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Swanson School of Enginering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. Electronic address: esejdic@ieee.org.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

The Aspirometer: A noninvasive tool to detect swallowing safety and efficiencyR01HD074819 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI COYLE, JAMES L, SEJDIC, ERVIN · 2013 to 2022
$3.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD074819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cervical auscultation refers to the observation and analysis of sounds or vibrations captured during swallowing using either a stethoscope or acoustic/vibratory detectors. Microphones and accelerometers have recently become two common sensors used in modern cervical auscultation methods. There are open questions about whether swallowing signals recorded by these two sensors provide unique or complementary information about swallowing function; or whether they present interchangeable information. This study aims to compare of swallowing signals recorded by a microphone and a tri-axial accelerometer from 72 patients (mean age 63.94 ± 12.58 years, 42 male, 30 female), who had videofluoroscopic examination. The participants swallowed one or more boluses of thickened liquids of different consistencies, including thin liquids, nectar-thick liquids, and pudding. A comfortable self-selected volume from a cup or a controlled volume by the examiner from a 5 ml spoon was given to the participants. A broad feature set was extracted in time, information-theoretic, and frequency domains from each of 881 swallows presented in this study. The swallowing sounds exhibited significantly higher frequency content and kurtosis values than the swallowing vibrations. In addition, the Lempel-Ziv complexity was lower for swallowing sounds than those for swallowing vibrations. To conclude, information provided by microphones and accelerometers about swallowing function are unique and these two transducers are not interchangeable. Consequently, the selection of transducer would be a vital step in future studies.

Indexed as

AcousticsDeglutitionVibrationAccelerometryAgedAuscultationDeglutition DisordersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTransducersCervical auscultationMicrophoneSignal processingSwallowing difficultiesTri-axial accelerometry

Identifiers

PMID28495001
PMCPMC5455149
OpenAlexW2594658247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.