Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28494976›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American College of Cardiology2017

Prognostic Implications of Moderate Aortic Stenosis in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction.

Lennart van Gils, Marie-Annick Clavel, E Mara Vollema, Rebecca T Hahn, Ernest Spitzer, Victoria Delgado, Tamim Nazif, Peter P De Jaegere, Marcel L Geleijnse, Ori Ben-Yehuda and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Moderate Aortic Stenosis With Cardiac Damage: A New Type of Severe Aortic Stenosis.Structural heart : the journal of the Heart Team · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Lennart van GilsDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Marie-Annick ClavelDepartment of Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute/Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
E Mara VollemaDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Rebecca T HahnDepartment of Cardiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Ernest SpitzerDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Victoria DelgadoDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Tamim NazifDepartment of Cardiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Peter P De JaegereDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Marcel L GeleijnseDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Ori Ben-YehudaDepartment of Cardiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Jeroen J BaxDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Martin B LeonDepartment of Cardiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York.
Philippe PibarotDepartment of Cardiology, Quebec Heart and Lung Institute/Laval University, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.
Nicolas M Van MieghemDepartment of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: n.vanmieghem@erasmusmc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeft ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction and moderate aortic stenosis (AS) are more frequent with advancing age and often coexist. Afterload reduction is the mainstay of pharmacological treatment of heart failure (HF). Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is only formally indicated for symptomatic severe AS.

objectivesThis study sought to determine the clinical outcome of patients with concomitant moderate AS and LV systolic dysfunction.

methodsEchocardiographic and clinical data of patients with moderate AS and LV systolic dysfunction between 2010 and 2015 from 4 large academic institutions were retrospectively analyzed. Moderate AS was defined as aortic valve area between 1.0 and 1.5 cm

resultsA total of 305 patients (mean age 73 ± 11 years; 75% male) were included. The majority were symptomatic at the time of index echocardiogram (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class II: 42%; NYHA functional class III: 28%; and NYHA functional class IV: 4%). Ischemic heart disease was present in 72% of patients. At 4-year follow-up, the primary composite endpoint occurred in 61%. The main predictors for the primary endpoint were male sex (p = 0.022), NYHA functional class III or IV (p < 0.001), and peak aortic jet velocity (p < 0.001). The rate of the composite of all-cause death or HF hospitalization was 48%, rate of all-cause death was 36%, and rate of HF hospitalization was 27%. AVR occurred in 24% of patients.

conclusionsPatients with concomitant moderate AS and LV systolic dysfunction are at high risk for clinical events. Further studies are needed to determine if earlier AVR in these patients might improve clinical outcome.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAortic Valve StenosisEchocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient AdmissionRetrospective StudiesVentricular Dysfunction, Leftheart failureoutcomespeak aortic jet velocitysurgical aortic valve replacementtranscatheter aortic valve replacement

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.