Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28494963›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2017

Design and Properties of Genetically Encoded Probes for Sensing Macromolecular Crowding.

Boqun Liu, Christoffer Åberg, Floris J van Eerden, Siewert J Marrink, Bert Poolman, Arnold J Boersma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Liposome-EncapsulatedACS synthetic biology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Physicochemical homeostasis in bacteria.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genetically-encoded BRET probes shed light on ligand bias-induced variable ion selectivity in TRPV1 and P2X5/7.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Boqun LiuDepartment of Biochemistry, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute & Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Christoffer ÅbergDepartment of Biochemistry, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute & Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Floris J van EerdenDepartment of Biochemistry, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute & Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Siewert J MarrinkDepartment of Biochemistry, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute & Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Bert PoolmanDepartment of Biochemistry, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute & Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: b.poolman@chem.rug.nl.
Arnold J BoersmaDepartment of Biochemistry, Groningen Biomolecular Sciences and Biotechnology Institute & Zernike Institute for Advanced Materials, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: a.j.boersma@rug.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cells are highly crowded with proteins and polynucleotides. Any reaction that depends on the available volume can be affected by macromolecular crowding, but the effects of crowding in cells are complex and difficult to track. Here, we present a set of Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based crowding-sensitive probes and investigate the role of the linker design. We investigate the sensors in vitro and in vivo and by molecular dynamics simulations. We find that in vitro all the probes can be compressed by crowding, with a magnitude that increases with the probe size, the crowder concentration, and the crowder size. We capture the role of the linker in a heuristic scaling model, and we find that compression is a function of size of the probe and volume fraction of the crowder. The FRET changes observed in Escherichia coli are more complicated, where FRET-increases and scaling behavior are observed solely with probes that contain the helices in the linker. The probe with the highest sensitivity to crowding in vivo yields the same macromolecular volume fractions as previously obtained from cell dry weight. The collection of new probes provides more detailed readouts on the macromolecular crowding than a single sensor.

Indexed as

Molecular ImagingMolecular ProbesEscherichia coliFluorescence Resonance Energy TransferFluorometryMacromolecular SubstancesMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, FluorescenceMolecular Dynamics SimulationMacromolecular SubstancesMolecular Probes

Identifiers

PMID28494963
PMCPMC5425406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.