Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28494783›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2017

Genome-wide association study confirm major QTL for backfat fatty acid composition on SSC14 in Duroc pigs.

Maren van Son, Eli Gjerlaug Enger, Harald Grove, Roger Ros-Freixedes, Matthew P Kent, Sigbjørn Lien, Eli Grindflek

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Significance testing and genomic inflation factor using high-density genotypes or whole-genome sequence data.Journal of animal breeding and genetics = Zeitschrift fur Tierzuchtung und Zuchtungsbiologie · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Maren van SonNorsvin SA, Storhamargata 44, , 2317, Hamar, Norway. maren.van.son@norsvin.no.ORCID 0000-0002-4892-3387
Eli Gjerlaug EngerNorsvin SA, Storhamargata 44, , 2317, Hamar, Norway.
Harald GroveCentre for Integrative Genetics (CIGENE), Department for Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P. O. Box 5003, 1432, Ås, Norway.
Roger Ros-FreixedesDepartament de Ciència Animal, Universitat de Lleida-Agrotecnio Center, 191 Av Alcalde Rovira Roure, 25198, Lleida, Catalonia, Spain.
Matthew P KentCentre for Integrative Genetics (CIGENE), Department for Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P. O. Box 5003, 1432, Ås, Norway.
Sigbjørn LienCentre for Integrative Genetics (CIGENE), Department for Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P. O. Box 5003, 1432, Ås, Norway.
Eli GrindflekNorsvin SA, Storhamargata 44, , 2317, Hamar, Norway.
Norsvin (Norway) · NONorwegian University of Life Sciences · NORoslin Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFatty acid composition contributes importantly to meat quality and is essential to the nutritional value of the meat. Identification of genetic factors underlying levels of fatty acids can be used to breed for pigs with healthier meat. The aim of this study was to conduct genome-wide association studies (GWAS) to identify QTL regions affecting fatty acid composition in backfat from the pig breeds Duroc and Landrace.

resultsUsing data from the Axiom porcine 660 K array, we performed GWAS on 454 Duroc and 659 Landrace boars for fatty acid phenotypes measured by near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) technology (C16:0, C16:1n-7, C18:0, C18:1n-9, C18:2n-6, C18:3n-3, total saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids and polyunsaturated fatty acids). Two QTL regions on SSC4 and SSC14 were identified in Duroc for the de novo synthesized fatty acids traits, whereas one QTL on SSC8 was detected in Landrace for C16:1n-7. The QTL region on SSC14 has been reported in previous studies and a putative causative mutation has been suggested in the promoter region of the SCD gene. Whole genome re-sequencing data was used for genotype imputation and to fine map the SSC14 QTL region in Norwegian Duroc. This effort confirms the location of the QTL on this chromosome as well as suggesting other putative candidate genes in the region. The most significant single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) located on SSC14 explain between 55 and 76% of the genetic variance and between 27 and 54% of the phenotypic variance for the de novo synthesized fatty acid traits in Norwegian Duroc. For the QTL region on SSC8 in Landrace, the most significant SNP explained 19% of the genetic variance and 5% of the phenotypic variance for C16:1n-7.

conclusionsThis study confirms a major QTL affecting fatty acid composition on SSC14 in Duroc, which can be used in genetic selection to increase the level of fatty acid desaturation. The SSC14 QTL was not segregating in the Landrace population, but another QTL on SSC8 affecting C16:1n-7 was identified and might be used to increase the level of desaturation in meat products from this breed.

Indexed as

Genome-Wide Association StudyAnimalsBackFatty AcidsQuantitative Trait LociSwineFatty AcidsFatty acid compositionFine mappingGWASPigsQTL mapping

Identifiers

PMID28494783
PMCPMC5426056
OpenAlexW2612049520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.