Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28494760›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2017

The Picture Talk Project: Starting a Conversation with Community Leaders on Research with Remote Aboriginal Communities of Australia.

E F M Fitzpatrick, G Macdonald, A L C Martiniuk, H D'Antoine, J Oscar, M Carter, T Lawford, E J Elliott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Community engagement and ethical global health research.Global bioethics = Problemi di bioetica · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

E F M FitzpatrickDiscipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. EmilyFitzp@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1990-8591
G MacdonaldDepartment of Anthropology, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
A L C MartiniukSydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
H D'AntoineMenzies School of Health Research, Darwin, NT, Australia.
J OscarMarninwarntikura Women's Resource Centre, Fitzroy Crossing, WA, Australia.
M CarterNindilingarri Cultural Health Services, Fitzroy Crossing, WA, Australia.
T LawfordKimberley Aboriginal Law and Culture Centre, Fitzroy Crossing, Australia.
E J ElliottDiscipline of Paediatrics and Child Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearchers are required to seek consent from Indigenous communities prior to conducting research but there is inadequate information about how Indigenous people understand and become fully engaged with this consent process. Few studies evaluate the preference or understanding of the consent process for research with Indigenous populations. Lack of informed consent can impact on research findings.

methodsThe Picture Talk Project was initiated with senior Aboriginal leaders of the Fitzroy Valley community situated in the far north of Western Australia. Aboriginal people were interviewed about their understanding and experiences of research and consent processes. Transcripts were analysed using NVivo10 software with an integrated method of inductive and deductive coding and based in grounded theory. Local Aboriginal interpreters validated coding. Major themes were defined and supporting quotes sourced.

resultsInterviews with Aboriginal leaders (n = 20) were facilitated by a local Aboriginal Community Navigator who could interpret if necessary and provide cultural guidance. Participants were from all four major local language groups of the Fitzroy Valley; aged 31 years and above; and half were male. Themes emerging from these discussions included Research-finding knowledge; Being respectful of Aboriginal people, Working on country, and Being flexible with time; Working together with good communication; Reciprocity-two-way learning; and Reaching consent.

conclusionThe project revealed how much more there is to be learned about how research with remote Aboriginal communities should be conducted such that it is both culturally respectful and, importantly, meaningful for participants. We identify important elements in community consultation about research and seeking consent.

Indexed as

CommunicationLeadershipResearchRural PopulationAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansInformed ConsentInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchAustralian aboriginal peopleCommunityConsentEngagementIndigenousResearch

Identifiers

PMID28494760
PMCPMC5426070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.