Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28494619›Full record

ReviewChronic respiratory disease2018

Improving quality of care for end-stage respiratory disease: Changes in attitude, changes in service.

D Robin Taylor, Scott A Murray

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chronic respiratory disease, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

D Robin Taylor1 NHS Lanarkshire and Honorary Fellow, Faculty of Medicine, The Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Scott A Murray3 Primary Palliative Care, The Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The illness trajectory for many patients with severe respiratory disease is characterized by steady decline. Yet most healthcare resources are poured into managing acute exacerbations that are only temporarily effective. Further, 'bad deaths' can result from inappropriate medical interventions at times of crisis. In this article, we describe a range of changes in attitudes, behaviour and service provision that together focus on improving quality of care for respiratory patients with frequent crises. These changes include prognostic conversations, developing and implementing anticipatory care plans both in hospital and in the outpatient settings, and establishing a supportive care clinic devoted to complex disease and optimizing palliative care. The underpinning philosophy is that common sense and compassion should motivate broader and more flexible care much more than adherence to the 'curative-restorative' guidelines-based model.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningQuality ImprovementQuality of Health CareAttitude to HealthHumansPalliative CarePatient Care BundlesPrognosisPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRespiratory Tract DiseasesTerminal Careacute exacerbationsadvance care plancare bundleCOPDpalliative caretreatment escalation/limitation

Identifiers

PMID28494619
PMCPMC5802655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.