Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28494585›Full record

ArticleBiochemistry2017

Induced Fit Is a Special Case of Conformational Selection.

Pradipta Chakraborty, Enrico Di Cera

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biochemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The active site region plays a critical role in NaThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mechanisms of ligand binding.Biophysics reviews · 2020
    Review
  13. NaScience advances · 2020
    Article
  14. The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pradipta ChakrabortyEdward A. Doisy Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine , St. Louis, Missouri 63104, United States.
Enrico Di CeraEdward A. Doisy Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Saint Louis University School of Medicine , St. Louis, Missouri 63104, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2300-4891

Funding

STUDIES ON THROMBIN ALLOSTERYR01HL049413 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Enrico Di Cera · 2000 to 2026
$9.6M
Translational Research Skills Development CoreU54HL112303 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SADLER, J EVAN · 2012 to 2016
$8.8M
Studies on the anticoagulant properties of thrombinR01HL073813 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DI CERA, ENRICO · 2003 to 2015
$5.3M
BIOPHYSICAL STUDIES OF THROMBINR29HL049413 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DI CERA, ENRICO · 1995 to 1999
–
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL049413NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL073813NHLBI NIH HHS R29 HL049413NHLBI NIH HHS U54 HL112303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conformational selection (CS) and induced fit (IF) are two widely used interpretations of binding of a ligand to biological macromolecules. Both mechanisms envision a two-step reaction in which a conformational transition either precedes (CS) or follows (IF) the binding step. Under pseudo-first-order conditions where the ligand is in excess compared to the macromolecule, both mechanisms produce two relaxations. A fast one eventually increases linearly with ligand concentration and reflects the binding interaction. A slow one saturates to a constant value after decreasing or increasing hyperbolically with ligand concentration. This relaxation is the one most often accessible to experimental measurements and is potentially diagnostic of the mechanism involved. A relaxation that decreases unequivocally identifies CS, but a hyperbolic increase is compatible with both CS and IF. The potential ambiguity between the two mechanisms is more than qualitative. Here we show that the entire kinetic repertoire of IF is nothing but a mathematical special case of CS as revealed by a simple transformation of the rate constants, which emphasizes the need for independent support of either mechanism from additional experimental evidence. We discuss a simple strategy for distinguishing between IF and CS under the most common conditions encountered in practice, i.e., when the ligand is in excess compared to the macromolecule and a single relaxation is accessible to experimental measurements.

Indexed as

Catalytic DomainLigandsProtein ConformationThrombinLigandsThrombin

Identifiers

PMID28494585
PMCPMC5554585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.