ReviewUltrasonography (Seoul, Korea)2017
Ultrasonographic evaluation of women with pathologic nipple discharge.
Review in Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retroareolar Intraductal Lesions Detected by Screening Ultrasound in Dense Breasts: Malignancy Rate and Predictive Imaging Features.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Clinical and Imaging Characteristics in the Diagnosis and Surgical Management of Nipple Discharge Without Clinically Palpable Masses: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Thoracic cancer · 2026Article
- Knowledge and awareness of breast cancer signs and symptoms among Jordanian women.Future science OA · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a clinical-bimodal nomogram to predict the malignancy of pathologic nipple discharge.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Ductal abnormalities as primary findings on breast ultrasonography: a literature review and proposed classification.Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea) · 2025Article
- Role of immediate injection of methylene blue after fiberoptic ductoscopy in selective ductectomy for patients with pathological nipple discharge.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Clinical Characteristics and Independent Risk Factors for Pathologic Nipple Discharge of 375 Cases.The breast journal · 2025Article
- The nipple-areolar complex: anatomy, methods and pathologic findings, between senologist and dermatologist.Journal of ultrasound · 2023Article
- Use of High-Frequency Transducers in Breast Sonography.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis in female patients with nipple discharge.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2022Article
- A comparative analysis of diagnostic values of high-frequency ultrasound and fiberoptic ductoscopy for pathologic nipple discharge.BMC medical imaging · 2022Article
- The Value of Adding Ductography to Ultrasonography for the Evaluation of Pathologic Nipple Discharge in Women with Negative Mammography.Korean journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Stereotaxic Core-Needle Biopsy in Assessing Intraductal Pathologic Findings at Ductography.European journal of breast health · 2022Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI for patients with suspicious nipple discharge and negative mammography and ultrasound: a prospective study.European radiology · 2021Article
- Multimodality approach to the nipple-areolar complex: a pictorial review and diagnostic algorithm.Insights into imaging · 2020Review
- Nipple Ultrasound: A Pictorial Essay.Korean journal of radiology · 2020Review
- A Nomogram to Predict the Probability of Breast Intraductal Tumors in Patients with Nipple Discharge: A Real-World Study Based on Our 13-Year Clinical Experience.Cancer management and research · 2020Article
- Nipple discharge: The state of the art.BJR open · 2019Review
- Nipple Adenoma: Correlation of Imaging Findings and Histopathology.Journal of breast imagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nipple discharge is a common symptom that is alarming for the patient since it can be a presenting symptom of breast cancer. Breast imaging is used to examine women with pathologic nipple discharge in order to detect any lesions that may be present and to assist in the differential diagnosis. The modalities of breast imaging include mammography, breast ultrasonography (US), and magnetic resonance imaging. Breast US is currently considered to be useful for the visualization of ductal structures and intraductal lesions that cause nipple discharge. In this review, we discuss US techniques that assist in the clear visualization of ductal structures and intraductal lesions in patients with nipple discharge. Controversy remains regarding the evaluation and management of patients with nipple discharge, and we summarize the results available in the currently published literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.