Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28494507›Full record

ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society2017

Subepidermal moisture detection of pressure induced tissue damage on the trunk: The pressure ulcer detection study outcomes.

Barbara M Bates-Jensen, Heather E McCreath, Anabel Patlan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04884737 (Decreasing Intraoperative Skin Damage in Prone Position Surgeries), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
20.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04884737 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Decreasing Intraoperative Skin Damage in Prone Position Surgeries

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, Los AngelesRan2021 to 2023Enrolled107ConditionsPressure InjuryArmsMepilex Border Flex® (MBF) dressing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. A blinded clinical study using a subepidermal moisture biocapacitance measurement device for early detection of pressure injuries.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Reliability of the Bates-Jensen wound assessment tool for pressure injury assessment: The pressure ulcer detection study.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Barbara M Bates-JensenSchool of Nursing, UCLA. Los Angeles, California.
Heather E McCreathDivision of Geriatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Los Angeles, California.
Anabel PatlanSchool of Nursing, UCLA. Los Angeles, California.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

UCLA OLDER AMERICANS INDEPENDENCE CENTERP30AG028748 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MOORE, ALISON AHERN · 2006 to 2017
$9.8M
Biophysical Measure To Predict Pressure Ulcers In Nursing Home ResidentsR01NR010736 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BATES-JENSEN, BARBARA M. · 2009 to 2012
$1.2M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG028748NINR NIH HHS R01 NR010736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examined the relationship between subepidermal moisture measured using surface electrical capacitance and visual skin assessment of pressure ulcers at the trunk location (sacral, ischial tuberosities) in 417 nursing home residents residing in 19 facilities. Participants were on average older (mean age of 77 years), 58% were female, over half were ethnic minorities (29% African American, 12% Asian American, and 21% Hispanic), and at risk for pressure ulcers (mean score for Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk of 15.6). Concurrent visual assessments and subepidermal moisture were obtained at the sacrum and right and left ischium weekly for 16 weeks. Visual assessment was categorized as normal, erythema, stage 1 pressure ulcer, Deep Tissue Injury or stage 2+ pressure ulcer using the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel 2009 classification system. Incidence of any skin damage was 52%. Subepidermal moisture was measured with a dermal phase meter where higher readings indicate greater moisture (range: 0-70 tissue dielectric constant), with values increasing significantly with the presence of skin damage. Elevated subepidermal moisture values co-occurred with concurrent skin damage in generalized multinomial logistic models (to control for repeated observations) at the sacrum, adjusting for age and risk. Higher subepidermal moisture values were associated with visual damage 1 week later using similar models. Threshold values for subepidermal moisture were compared to visual ratings to predict skin damage 1 week later. Subepidermal moisture of 39 tissue dielectric constant units predicted 41% of future skin damage while visual ratings predicted 27%. Thus, this method of detecting early skin damage holds promise for clinicians, especially as it is objective and equally valid for all groups of patients.

Indexed as

AgedEarly DiagnosisErythemaEthnicityFemaleGeriatric NursingHomes for the AgedHumansIncidenceLongitudinal StudiesMaleNursing HomesPhysical ExaminationPressure UlcerRisk FactorsSkin Care

Identifiers

PMID28494507
PMCPMC5568916
OpenAlexW2612867416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.