Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28494018›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Pathogenic outcome following experimental infection of sheep with Chlamydia abortus variant strains LLG and POS.

Morag Livingstone, Nicholas Wheelhouse, Hannah Ensor, Mara Rocchi, Stephen Maley, Kevin Aitchison, Sean Wattegedera, Kim Wilson, Michelle Sait, Victoria Siarkou and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pathological, immunohistochemical and molecular studies onVeterinary research forum : an international quarterly journal · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Chlamydiosis in Animals.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  4. Evaluation of the Protective Efficacy of Different Doses of aAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  5. Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024
    Review
  6. The Immune Response in the Uteri and Placentae ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Efficacy of TwoVaccines · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Morag LivingstoneMoredun Research Institute, Penicuik, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Nicholas WheelhouseMoredun Research Institute, Penicuik, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Hannah EnsorBiomathematics and Statistics Scotland, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Mara RocchiMoredun Research Institute, Penicuik, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Stephen MaleyMoredun Research Institute, Penicuik, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Kevin AitchisonMoredun Research Institute, Penicuik, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Sean WattegederaMoredun Research Institute, Penicuik, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Kim WilsonMoredun Research Institute, Penicuik, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Michelle SaitMoredun Research Institute, Penicuik, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Victoria SiarkouLaboratory of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, School of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Evangelia VretouFormerly Laboratory of Biotechnology, Department of Microbiology, Hellenic Pasteur Institute, Athens, Greece.
Gary EntricanMoredun Research Institute, Penicuik, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
Mark DagleishMoredun Research Institute, Penicuik, Midlothian, United Kingdom.
David LongbottomMoredun Research Institute, Penicuik, Midlothian, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0086-8443
Moredun Research Institute · GBAristotle University of Thessaloniki · GRBiomathematics and Statistics Scotland · GBPasteur Hellenic Institute · GR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the pathogenesis of two variant strains (LLG and POS) of Chlamydia abortus, in comparison to a typical wild-type strain (S26/3) which is known to be responsible for late term abortion in small ruminants. Challenge with the three strains at mid-gestation resulted in similar pregnancy outcomes, with abortion occurring in approximately 50-60% of ewes with the mean gestational lengths also being similar. However, differences were observed in the severity of placental pathology, with infection appearing milder for strain LLG, which was reflected in the lower number of organisms shed in vaginal swabs post-partum and less gross pathology and organisms present in placental smears. Results for strain POS were somewhat different than LLG with a more focal restriction of infection observed. Post-abortion antibody responses revealed prominent differences in seropositivity to the major outer membrane protein (MOMP) present in elementary body (EB) preparations under denaturing conditions, most notably with anti-LLG and anti-POS convalescent sera where there was no or reduced detection of MOMP present in EBs derived from the three strains. These results and additional analysis of whole EB and chlamydial outer membrane complex preparations suggest that there are conformational differences in MOMP for the three strains. Overall, the results suggest that gross placental pathology and clinical outcome is not indicative of bacterial colonization and the severity of infection. The results also highlight potential conformational differences in MOMP epitopes that perhaps impact on disease diagnosis and the development of new vaccines.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, BacterialChlamydiaChlamydia InfectionsFemaleImmunoblottingImmunohistochemistryPlacentaPregnancySheepSheep DiseasesTreatment OutcomeVaginaAntigens, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID28494018
PMCPMC5426687
OpenAlexW2612505929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.