Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28493885›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Genotypic and phenotypic diversity of Lactobacillus rhamnosus clinical isolates, their comparison with strain GG and their recognition by complement system.

Eija Nissilä, François P Douillard, Jarmo Ritari, Lars Paulin, Hanna M Järvinen, Pia Rasinkangas, Karita Haapasalo, Seppo Meri, Hanna Jarva, Willem M de Vos

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bacteraemia Caused by Probiotic Strains ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Potential of Cell-Free Supernatant fromPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Members of theMicroorganisms · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Review
  16. Complete genome sequence ofGut pathogens · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Eija NissiläDepartment of Bacteriology & Immunology and Research Programs Unit, Immunobiology, University of Helsinki, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8089-1266
François P DouillardDepartment of Bacteriology & Immunology and Research Programs Unit, Immunobiology, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Jarmo RitariDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, Division of Microbiology and Epidemiology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Lars PaulinInstitute of Biotechnology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Hanna M JärvinenDepartment of Bacteriology & Immunology and Research Programs Unit, Immunobiology, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Pia RasinkangasDepartment of Veterinary Biosciences, Division of Microbiology and Epidemiology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Karita HaapasaloDepartment of Bacteriology & Immunology and Research Programs Unit, Immunobiology, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Seppo MeriDepartment of Bacteriology & Immunology and Research Programs Unit, Immunobiology, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Hanna JarvaDepartment of Bacteriology & Immunology and Research Programs Unit, Immunobiology, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Willem M de VosDepartment of Bacteriology & Immunology and Research Programs Unit, Immunobiology, University of Helsinki, Finland.
University of Helsinki · FI

Funding

European Research Council 250172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains are ubiquitous in fermented foods, and in the human body where they are commensals naturally present in the normal microbiota composition of gut, vagina and skin. However, in some cases, Lactobacillus spp. have been implicated in bacteremia. The aim of the study was to examine the genomic and immunological properties of 16 clinical blood isolates of L. rhamnosus and to compare them to the well-studied L. rhamnosus probiotic strain GG. Blood cultures from bacteremic patients were collected at the Helsinki University Hospital laboratory in 2005-2011 and L. rhamnosus strains were isolated and characterized by genomic sequencing. The capacity of the L. rhamnosus strains to activate serum complement was studied using immunological assays for complement factor C3a and the terminal pathway complement complex (TCC). Binding of complement regulators factor H and C4bp was also determined using radioligand assays. Furthermore, the isolated strains were evaluated for their ability to aggregate platelets and to form biofilms in vitro. Genomic comparison between the clinical L. rhamnosus strains showed them to be clearly different from L. rhamnosus GG and to cluster in two distinct lineages. All L. rhamnosus strains activated complement in serum and none of them bound complement regulators. Four out of 16 clinical blood isolates induced platelet aggregation and/or formed more biofilms than L. rhamnosus GG, which did not display platelet aggregation activity nor showed strong biofilm formation. These findings suggest that clinical L. rhamnosus isolates show considerable heterogeneity but are clearly different from L. rhamnosus GG at the genomic level. All L. rhamnosus strains are still normally recognized by the human complement system.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsBiofilmsCluster AnalysisComplement ActivationComplement System ProteinsFimbriae, BacterialGenes, BacterialGenotypeHumansLacticaseibacillus rhamnosusPhenotypePlasmidsPlatelet AggregationPolysaccharides, BacterialBacterial ProteinsComplement System ProteinsPolysaccharides, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID28493885
PMCPMC5426626
OpenAlexW2613580830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.