Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28493543›Full record

ArticleCancer2017

Contribution of patient, physician, and environmental factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up for abnormal colorectal cancer screening test results.

Melissa R Partin, Amy A Gravely, James F Burgess, David A Haggstrom, Sarah E Lillie, David B Nelson, Sean M Nugent, Aasma Shaukat, Shahnaz Sultan, Louise C Walter and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Optimal Approach to Colorectal Cancer Screening.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Black and White Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening and Screening Outcomes: A Narrative Review.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effects of the Affordable Care Act on the Receipt of Colonoscopies among the Insured Elderly.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa R PartinCenter for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8188-6768
Amy A GravelyCenter for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
James F BurgessCenter for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research, Boston Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts.
David A HaggstromVeterans Affairs Health Services Research & Development Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Sarah E LillieCenter for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
David B NelsonCenter for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Sean M NugentCenter for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Aasma ShaukatCenter for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Shahnaz SultanCenter for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Louise C WalterDivision of Geriatrics, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center and University of California, San Francisco, California.
Diana J BurgessCenter for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
University of Minnesota · USMinneapolis VA Health Care System · USBoston University · USRichard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center · USSan Francisco VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Midcareer Mentoring Award for Patient-Oriented Research in AgingK24AG041180 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI WALTER, LOUISE C. · 2011 to 2016
$909k
DEterminants of Timely Evaluation Colonoscopy for crc+ screening TestsI01HX000122 · VA · MINNEAPOLIS VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI PARTIN, MELISSA R. · 2009 to 2013
–
HSRD VA I01 HX000122NIA NIH HHS K24 AG041180
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatient, physician, and environmental factors were identified, and the authors examined the contribution of these factors to demographic and health variation in colonoscopy follow-up after a positive fecal occult blood test/fecal immunochemical test (FOBT/FIT) screening.

methodsIn total, 76,243 FOBT/FIT-positive patients were identified from 120 Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities between August 16, 2009 and March 20, 2011 and were followed for 6 months. Patient demographic (race/ethnicity, sex, age, marital status) and health characteristics (comorbidities), physician characteristics (training level, whether primary care provider) and behaviors (inappropriate FOBT/FIT screening), and environmental factors (geographic access, facility type) were identified from VHA administrative records. Patient behaviors (refusal, private sector colonoscopy use) were estimated with statistical text mining conducted on clinic notes, and follow-up predictors and adjusted rates were estimated using hierarchical logistic regression.

resultsRoughly 50% of individuals completed a colonoscopy at a VHA facility within 6 months. Age and comorbidity score were negatively associated with follow-up. Blacks were more likely to receive follow-up than whites. Environmental factors attenuated but did not fully account for these differences. Patient behaviors (refusal, private sector colonoscopy use) and physician behaviors (inappropriate screening) fully accounted for the small reverse race disparity and attenuated variation by age and comorbidity score. Patient behaviors (refusal and private sector colonoscopy use) contributed more to variation in follow-up rates than physician behaviors (inappropriate screening).

conclusionsIn the VHA, blacks are more likely to receive colonoscopy follow-up for positive FOBT/FIT results than whites, and follow-up rates markedly decline with advancing age and comorbidity burden. Patient and physician behaviors explain race variation in follow-up rates and contribute to variation by age and comorbidity burden. Cancer 2017;123:3502-12. Published 2017. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Indexed as

Occult BloodAgedAge FactorsAnalysis of VarianceColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualEarly Detection of CancerEnvironmentFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth BehaviorHospitals, VeteransHumansMaleMiddle Agedcolonoscopycolorectal neoplasmsdiagnostic servicesearly detection of cancerhealth services accessibilitymass screeningveterans health

Identifiers

PMID28493543
PMCPMC5589505
OpenAlexW2612032464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.