Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28493421›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2018

Quantitative proteomics in plant protease substrate identification.

Fatih Demir, Stefan Niedermaier, Joji Grace Villamor, Pitter Florian Huesgen

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Proteolysis in plant immunity.The Plant cell · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Knockout of a papain-like cysteine protease geneFrontiers in plant science · 2022
    Article
  5. Sensitive Plant N-Terminome Profiling with HUNTER.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Plant proteases and programmed cell death.Journal of experimental botany · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Ten Prominent Host Proteases in Plant-Pathogen Interactions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fatih DemirZEA-3 Analytics, Central Institute for Engineering, Electronics and Analytics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Str., Jülich, 52425, Germany.
Stefan NiedermaierZEA-3 Analytics, Central Institute for Engineering, Electronics and Analytics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Str., Jülich, 52425, Germany.
Joji Grace VillamorZEA-3 Analytics, Central Institute for Engineering, Electronics and Analytics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Str., Jülich, 52425, Germany.
Pitter Florian HuesgenZEA-3 Analytics, Central Institute for Engineering, Electronics and Analytics, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Str., Jülich, 52425, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contents Summary 936 I. Introduction 936 II. The quest for plant protease substrates - proteomics to the rescue? 937 III. Quantitative proteome comparison reveals candidate substrates 938 IV. Dynamic metabolic stable isotope labeling to measure protein turnover in vivo 938 V. Terminomics - large-scale identification of protease cleavage sites 939 VI. Substrate or not substrate, that is the question 940 VII. Concluding remarks 941 Acknowledgements 941 References 941 SUMMARY: Proteolysis is a central regulatory mechanism of protein homeostasis and protein function that affects all aspects of plant life. Higher plants encode for hundreds of proteases, but their physiological substrates and hence their molecular functions remain mostly unknown. Current quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomics enables unbiased large-scale interrogation of the proteome and its modifications. Here we provide an overview of proteomics techniques that allow profiling of changes in protein abundance, measurement of proteome turnover rates, identification of protease cleavage sites in vivo and in vitro and determination of protease sequence specificity. We discuss how these techniques can help to reveal protease substrates and determine plant protease function, illustrated by recent studies on selected plant proteases.

Indexed as

Isotope LabelingPeptide HydrolasesPlantsProteomeProteomicsSubstrate SpecificityPeptide HydrolasesProteomedegradomicsplantsproteasesprotease substratesproteolysisproteomicsterminome

Identifiers

PMID28493421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.