Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28493324›Full record

ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society2017

Level-specific amputations and resulting regenerative outcomes in the mouse distal phalanx.

Connie S Chamberlain, Justin J Jeffery, Ellen M Leiferman, Tugrul Yildirim, Xin Sun, Geoffrey S Baer, William L Murphy, Ray Vanderby

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. To regenerate or not to regenerate: Vertebrate model organisms of regeneration-competency and -incompetency.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Transcriptomic analysis of bone and fibrous tissue morphogenesis during digit tip regeneration in the adult mouse.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2020
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Connie S ChamberlainDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Justin J JefferyDepartment of Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Ellen M LeifermanDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Tugrul YildirimDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Xin SunLaboratory of Genetics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Geoffrey S BaerDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
William L MurphyDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
Ray VanderbyDepartment of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USIn-Q-Tel · USUniversity of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center · US

Funding

Modulation of the Immune System to Improve Ligament/Ligament Graft HealingR01AR059916 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI MURPHY, WILLIAM L., VANDERBY, RAY · 2010 to 2014
$1.4M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR059916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouse digit tip regeneration involves an intricate coordinated regrowth of the terminal phalanx, nail, dermis and epidermis. During this time, regenerating digits undergo wound healing, blastema formation, and differentiation. However, the regenerative response of the digit is dependent on the level of the amputation. Amputation of <30% of the distal phalanx (P3), with part of the base nail remaining, results in extensive digit regeneration. In contrast, >60% P3 removal results in no regeneration. This level-dependent regenerative ability of the mouse digit provides a comparative model between regeneration and non-regeneration that may enable identification of specific factors critical to regeneration. Although the ability to create regenerating and non-regenerating conditions has been well established, the regenerative response between these regions ("intermediate" zone) has received less scrutiny, and may add insight to the regenerative processes, including the degree of histolysis, and the level of blastema formation. The objective of this study is then to compare the regeneration capacity between amputation levels within the regenerating (<30%), intermediate (40-59%), and non-regenerating (>60%) regions. Results indicated that regenerative and intermediate amputations led to significant histolysis and blastema formation of the distal phalanx 14 days post-amputation. Unlike the regenerating digits, intermediate amputations led to incomplete regeneration whereby regrowth of the digits were not to the levels of the intact or regenerating digits. Non-regenerating amputations did not exhibit significant histolysis or blastema formation. Remarkably, the histolytic process resulted in day 14 P3 lengths that were similar regardless of the initial amputation over 19%. The differences in histolysis, blastema formation and injury outcomes were also marked by changes in the number of proliferating cells and osteoclasts. Altogether, these results indicate that although intermediate amputations result in histolysis and blastema formation similar to regenerating digits, the resulting cellular composition of the blastema differs, contributing to incomplete regeneration.

Indexed as

Amputation, SurgicalRegenerationAnimalsApoptosisCell DifferentiationDisease Models, AnimalHindlimbHoof and ClawMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOsteoclastsToe PhalangesWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID28493324
PMCPMC5607635
OpenAlexW2612559606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.