ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society2017
Level-specific amputations and resulting regenerative outcomes in the mouse distal phalanx.
Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Special Issue "Fundamental and Practical Perspectives in Regenerative Medicine: Proceedings of the VI National Congress of Regenerative Medicine (2024)".International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Macrophage metabolism directs regenerative versus fibrotic healing through BMP signaling in the mouse digit tip.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Targeting lymphatic vessels enhances bone regeneration by augmenting osteoclast activity in mouse models of amputation.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Article
- Article
- Human fingertip regeneration follows clinical phases with distinct proteomic signatures.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2025Article
- Transcriptomic landscape around wound bed defines regenerative versus non-regenerative outcomes in mouse digit amputation.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Regeneration-specific promoter switching facilitates Mest expression in the mouse digit tip to modulate neutrophil response.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2024Article
- Regeneration-specific promoter switching facilitates Mest expression in the mouse digit tip to modulate neutrophil response.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- To regenerate or not to regenerate: Vertebrate model organisms of regeneration-competency and -incompetency.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2022Review
- Article
- Epidermal-Derived Hedgehog Signaling Drives Mesenchymal Proliferation during Digit Tip Regeneration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Article
- Transcriptomic analysis of bone and fibrous tissue morphogenesis during digit tip regeneration in the adult mouse.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2020Article
- Digit Tip Injuries: Current Treatment and Future Regenerative Paradigms.Stem cells international · 2019Review
- Digit Tip Regeneration: Merging Regeneration Biology with Regenerative Medicine.Stem cells translational medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Mouse digit tip regeneration involves an intricate coordinated regrowth of the terminal phalanx, nail, dermis and epidermis. During this time, regenerating digits undergo wound healing, blastema formation, and differentiation. However, the regenerative response of the digit is dependent on the level of the amputation. Amputation of <30% of the distal phalanx (P3), with part of the base nail remaining, results in extensive digit regeneration. In contrast, >60% P3 removal results in no regeneration. This level-dependent regenerative ability of the mouse digit provides a comparative model between regeneration and non-regeneration that may enable identification of specific factors critical to regeneration. Although the ability to create regenerating and non-regenerating conditions has been well established, the regenerative response between these regions ("intermediate" zone) has received less scrutiny, and may add insight to the regenerative processes, including the degree of histolysis, and the level of blastema formation. The objective of this study is then to compare the regeneration capacity between amputation levels within the regenerating (<30%), intermediate (40-59%), and non-regenerating (>60%) regions. Results indicated that regenerative and intermediate amputations led to significant histolysis and blastema formation of the distal phalanx 14 days post-amputation. Unlike the regenerating digits, intermediate amputations led to incomplete regeneration whereby regrowth of the digits were not to the levels of the intact or regenerating digits. Non-regenerating amputations did not exhibit significant histolysis or blastema formation. Remarkably, the histolytic process resulted in day 14 P3 lengths that were similar regardless of the initial amputation over 19%. The differences in histolysis, blastema formation and injury outcomes were also marked by changes in the number of proliferating cells and osteoclasts. Altogether, these results indicate that although intermediate amputations result in histolysis and blastema formation similar to regenerating digits, the resulting cellular composition of the blastema differs, contributing to incomplete regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.