ArticleSurgical endoscopy2017
A comparison between totally laparoscopic hydrocelectomy and scrotal incision hydrocelectomy with laparoscopic high ligation for pediatric cord hydrocele.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Hydrocele].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024Review
- Comparison of Percutaneous Internal Ring Suturing (PIRS) versus Open Ligation of the Patent Processus Vaginalis for the Treatment of Communicating Pediatric Hydrocele.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Laparoscopic percutaneous closure of patent processus vaginalis without hydrocelectomy for childhood primary hydrocele.Pediatric surgery international · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic hydrocelectomy with transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty or iliopubic tract repair for treatment of encysted spermatic cord hydrocele.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Article
- Laparoscopic management of infantile hydrocele in pediatric age group.Pediatric surgery international · 2022Article
- Laparoscopic vs. Open Repair Surgery for the Treatment of Communicating Hydrocele in Children: A Retrospective Study From a Single Center.Frontiers in surgery · 2021Article
- Benefits of laparoscopic posterior wall suture repair in treating adolescent indirect inguinal hernias.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study is to report clinical characteristics and to investigate the feasibility and safety of totally laparoscopic hydrocelectomy (TLH) compared to scrotal incision hydrocelectomy with laparoscopic high ligation (SIH) for pediatric cord hydrocele (CH).
methodsFrom September 2011 to February 2016, 148 patients underwent SIH, and 342 patients underwent TLH for CH. In the TLH group, a large hydrocele that could not pass through the internal ring was removed after percutaneous syringe aspiration. Age, laterality of hydrocele, inguinal comorbidities, operation time, surgical complications, and recurrences were evaluated.
resultsAll the patients had spermatic cord cysts and patent processus vaginalis in proximity to hydrocele (mixed type). The mean age of CH patients was 34.1 ± 22.1 months. CHs are more common on the right side (61.0%) than on the left (35.7%). Bilaterality occurred in 3.3%. Comorbidities such as hernia (8.6%) and cryptorchidism (1.2%) were observed. There were no complications except for two cases of wound hematoma in SIH group. There was one (0.7%) case of recurrence appeared in communicating hydrocele in SIH group. There were no significant differences in the age, laterality of hydrocele, inguinal comorbidities, operation time, complications, and recurrences between TLH and SIH groups. However, TLH for unilateral cord hydrocele had significantly shorter operation time compared to SIH. The mean operation time in TLH group was 15.6 ± 5.96 min and there was no conversion to open surgery.
conclusionsTLH for pediatric CH is a feasible and safe procedure without additional incisions. Therefore, TLH can be one of the surgical options for pediatric CH especially in mixed type.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.