Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28493033›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2018

Is there a genetic anticipation in breast and/or ovarian cancer families with the germline c.3481_3491del11 mutation?

R El Tannouri, E Albuisson, P Jonveaux, E Luporsi

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R El TannouriINSERM U954, University of Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France. rachelle.eltannouri@gmail.com.
E AlbuissonIECL CNRS, UMR 7502, BIOBASE, Pôle S²R, CHRU Nancy, InSciDens, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
P JonveauxHuman Genetics Laboratory, CHU Brabois, INSERM U954, University of Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
E LuporsiInstitute of Oncology of Lorraine (ICL Alexis Vautrin), INSERM U954, University of Lorraine, Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France.
Inserm · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the current analysis is to evaluate any differences of breast or ovarian cancer age at diagnosis between mothers and daughters carrying the c.3481_3491del11 mutation in the BRCA1 gene. A study cohort of 38 women carrying the c.3481_3491del11 mutation and affected by first breast or ovarian cancer who reported a first breast or ovarian cancer in their mother carrying the c.3481_3491del11 mutation, was identified in 37 different families including members with breast and/or ovarian cancer at the Oncology Institute of Lorraine. Twelve mothers underwent genetic testing. Twenty-five pairs of the 38 mothers-daughters pairs with c.3481_3491del11 mutation were affected by breast cancer and 13 pairs by ovarian cancer. Clinical and genetic data were collected from medical files and family pedigrees. Analyses were conducted for each cancer type. We investigated an early breast cancer detection effect due to early screening programs and also an increased breast tumor aggression. Since major improvements in breast cancer clinical management and imaging techniques appeared after 1980, we compared the age at breast cancer diagnosis and the age at death in mothers and daughters before and after 1980, first, in the group of women including mothers and daughters taken together and then in mothers and daughters separately. The mean age at breast cancer diagnosis was 45.28 ± 10.27 years in mothers and 39.80 ± 7.79 years in daughters (p = 0.026). The difference of age at ovarian cancer diagnosis in mother-daughter pairs was 8.62 ± 12.76 years (p = 0.032). When considering the group of women including mothers and daughters taken together, no significant difference of age at breast cancer diagnosis was found between women affected before 1980 and those affected after 1980 (p = 0.577). However, the age at death increased in these women after 1980 (p = 0.026). Comparison of age at breast cancer diagnosis in mothers and daughters separately, showed that daughters were affected at an earlier age after 1980 (p = 0.002). Daughters had a poor prognosis and died earlier than mothers after 1980. Our results may have reflected genetic anticipation in c.3481_3491del11 mutation breast and ovarian cancer families. In order to confirm our findings, a larger cohort would provide more precision to the difference of ages at breast or ovarian cancer diagnosis between mothers and daughters and more powerful statistical analyses. Increased aggression in daughters' tumors compared to those of mothers could be also considered as a parameter of genetic anticipation. Complete information on tumor profile and proliferation would allow us to study genetic anticipation by comparing the tumor phenotypes between mothers and daughters in the future.

Indexed as

Anticipation, GeneticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseAdultAgedAge of OnsetBase SequenceBRCA1 ProteinFemaleGerm-Line MutationHereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer SyndromeHeterozygoteHumansMiddle AgedMothersPrognosisRetrospective StudiesBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA1Breast cancerc.3481_3491del11Genetic anticipationOvarian cancer

Identifiers

PMID28493033
OpenAlexW2612045823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.