Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28493006›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2017

Activity of Combined Antifungal Agents Against Multidrug-Resistant Candida glabrata Strains.

Laura Bedin Denardi, Jéssica Tairine Keller, Vanessa Oliveira, Débora Alves Nunes Mario, Janio Morais Santurio, Sydney Hartz Alves

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Antifungal Combinations againstJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Frontiers in public health · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura Bedin DenardiPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Campus UFSM, Prédio 20, sala 4139, 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil. laura-denardi@hotmail.com.
Jéssica Tairine KellerCurso de Farmácia, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Vanessa OliveiraCurso de Farmácia, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Débora Alves Nunes MarioFaculdade Meridional-Imed, Escola de Saúde, Passo Fundo, RS, Brazil.
Janio Morais SanturioPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Farmacologia, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Sydney Hartz AlvesPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM), Campus UFSM, Prédio 20, sala 4139, 97105-900, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria · BRFaculdade Meridional · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 470229/2012-8Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul 2261-12
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we evaluated the in vitro activity of echinocandins, azoles, and amphotericin B alone and in combination against echinocandin/azole-sensitive and echinocandin/azole-resistant Candida glabrata isolates. Susceptibility tests were performed using the broth microdilution method in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute document M27-A3. The checkerboard method was used to evaluate the fractional inhibitory concentration index of the interactions. Cross-resistance was observed among echinocandins; 15% of the isolates resistant to caspofungin were also resistant to anidulafungin and micafungin. Synergistic activity was observed in 70% of resistant C. glabrata when anidulafungin was combined with voriconazole or posaconazole. Higher (85%) synergism was found in the combination of caspofungin and voriconazole. The combinations of caspofungin with fluconazole, posaconazole and amphotericin B, micafungin with fluconazole, posaconazole and voriconazole, and anidulafungin with amphotericin B showed indifferent activities for the majority of the isolates. Anidulafungin combined with fluconazole showed the same percentage of synergism and indifference (45%). Antagonism was detected in 50% of isolates when micafungin was combined with amphotericin B. Combinations of echinocandins and antifungal azoles have great potential for in vivo assays which are required to evaluate the efficacy of these combinations against multidrug-resistant C. glabrata strains.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, FungalDrug SynergismAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsAzolesCandida glabrataEchinocandinsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAmphotericin BAntifungal AgentsAzolesEchinocandinsAzolesCandida glabrataCombination therapyCross-resistanceEchinocandins

Identifiers

PMID28493006
OpenAlexW2612355784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.