Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28492993›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2017

[Choosing wisely at the end of life : Recommendations of the German Society for Palliative Medicine (DGP)].

B Alt-Epping

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

B Alt-EppingKlinik für Palliativmedizin, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Georg-August-Universität, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland. bernd.alt-epping@med.uni-goettingen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to an overuse of unnecessary or no longer indicated diagnostic or therapeutic procedures at the end of life in the sense of overtreatment, there is often also a lack of therapeutic awareness in terms of a healthcare deficit, for example concerning the recognition and treatment of symptoms and complex burden of the disease. Sticking closely to the methodology of the German S3 "Palliative Medicine" guideline, the Choosing wisely recommendations of the German Society for Palliative Medicine address various examples of over- and underuse of healthcare services and treatment at the end of life, and thus also mirror basic principles of palliative medical care.

Indexed as

Unnecessary ProceduresGermanyHumansPalliative MedicinePractice Guidelines as TopicSocieties, MedicalTerminal CareEnd of lifePhase of dyingRequirements and burdensS3 guideline “Palliative Medicine”

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.