ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2017
Complex Genes Are Preferentially Retained After Whole-Genome Duplication in Teleost Fish.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conserved and diverged embryonic expression patterns of panarthropod NK-Cluster genes and new evidence for CRE-shuffling.BMC ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Genome-Wide Identification ofMarine drugs · 2023Article
- Origin and Evolution of the Multifaceted Adherens Junction Component Plekha7.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- The divergence of alternative splicing between ohnologs in teleost fishes.BMC ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Global assessment of organ specific basal gene expression over a diurnal cycle with analyses of gene copies exhibiting cyclic expression patterns.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Substantially adaptive potential in polyploid cyprinid fishes: evidence from biogeographic, phylogenetic and genomic studies.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020Article
- OHNOLOGS v2: a comprehensive resource for the genes retained from whole genome duplication in vertebrates.Nucleic acids research · 2020Article
- Evolution of the RNAPlant physiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene duplication generates new genetic material which, if retained after duplication, may contribute to organismal evolution. A whole-genome duplication occurred in the ancestry of teleost fish and consequently there are many duplicated genes in teleost genomes. Indeed, it has been proposed that the evolutionary diversification of teleost fish may have been stimulated by the fish-specific genome duplication (FSGD). However, it is not clear which factors determine which genes are retained as duplicate copies and which return to a singleton state after duplication. In the present study, gene complexity, in terms of encoded protein length and functional domain number, is compared between duplicate and singleton genes for nine well-annotated teleost genomes. A total of 933 gene families with retained duplicates and 4590 singleton gene families are analysed. Genes with retained duplicates are found to be significantly longer (27.9-38.2%) and to have more functional domains (20.5-26.5%) than singleton genes in all the nine teleost genomes, suggesting that genes encoded longer proteins with and more functional domains were preferentially retained after whole-genome duplication in teleosts. This differential retention of duplicated genes will have increased the genomic complexity of teleost fish after FSGD which, together with differential duplicated gene retention as a lineage-splitting force, may have greatly contributed to the successful diversification of teleost fish.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.