Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28492966›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2017

Complex Genes Are Preferentially Retained After Whole-Genome Duplication in Teleost Fish.

Baocheng Guo

Abstract readLetter
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
13.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genome-Wide Identification ofMarine drugs · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evolution of the RNAPlant physiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Baocheng GuoThe Key Laboratory of Zoological Systematics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. guobaocheng@ioz.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-9796-5700
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene duplication generates new genetic material which, if retained after duplication, may contribute to organismal evolution. A whole-genome duplication occurred in the ancestry of teleost fish and consequently there are many duplicated genes in teleost genomes. Indeed, it has been proposed that the evolutionary diversification of teleost fish may have been stimulated by the fish-specific genome duplication (FSGD). However, it is not clear which factors determine which genes are retained as duplicate copies and which return to a singleton state after duplication. In the present study, gene complexity, in terms of encoded protein length and functional domain number, is compared between duplicate and singleton genes for nine well-annotated teleost genomes. A total of 933 gene families with retained duplicates and 4590 singleton gene families are analysed. Genes with retained duplicates are found to be significantly longer (27.9-38.2%) and to have more functional domains (20.5-26.5%) than singleton genes in all the nine teleost genomes, suggesting that genes encoded longer proteins with and more functional domains were preferentially retained after whole-genome duplication in teleosts. This differential retention of duplicated genes will have increased the genomic complexity of teleost fish after FSGD which, together with differential duplicated gene retention as a lineage-splitting force, may have greatly contributed to the successful diversification of teleost fish.

Indexed as

AnimalsEvolution, MolecularFishesGene DuplicationGenomicsPhylogenySequence AlignmentDomain numberDuplicated geneProtein lengthSingleton gene

Identifiers

PMID28492966
OpenAlexW2612375820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.