Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28492924›Full record

ArticleJAMA dermatology2017

Handheld Reflectance Confocal Microscopy for the Detection of Recurrent Extramammary Paget Disease.

Oriol Yélamos, Brian P Hibler, Miguel Cordova, Travis J Hollmann, Kivanc Kose, Michael A Marchetti, Patricia L Myskowski, Melissa P Pulitzer, Milind Rajadhyaksha, Anthony M Rossi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA dermatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Treatment of Extramammary Paget Disease and the Role of Reflectance Confocal Microscopy: A Prospective Study.Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Surgical Treatment for Extramammary Paget's Disease.Current treatment options in oncology · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Oriol YélamosDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York2Dermatology Department, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Brian P HiblerDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Miguel CordovaDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Travis J HollmannPathology Department, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Kivanc KoseDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Michael A MarchettiDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Patricia L MyskowskiDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Melissa P PulitzerPathology Department, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Milind RajadhyakshaDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Anthony M RossiDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Manu JainDermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Automated Image Guidance for Diagnosing Skin Cancer With Confocal MicroscopyR01CA199673 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI DY, JENNIFER G, RAJADHYAKSHA, MILIND · 2015 to 2018
$2.5M
Peri-operative confocal imaging-guided laser ablation of basal cell carcinomasR01EB020029 · NIBIB · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI RAJADHYAKSHA, MILIND · 2015 to 2018
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA199673NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) is commonly refractory to surgical and nonsurgical therapies. Identifying recurrent or persistent EMPD is challenging because the disease is multifocal, and multiple blind scouting biopsies are usually performed in this setting. Handheld reflectance confocal microscopy (HRCM) has been used to diagnose and map primary EMPD and therefore may be used to identify EMPD recurrences. Objective: To evaluate HRCM's diagnostic accuracy in the setting of recurrent or persistent EMPD as well as its potential diagnostic pitfalls. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective case series study included patients referred to the Dermatology Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016, with biopsy-proven EMPD in whom HRCM was used to monitor treatment response. Five patients were included, and 22 sites clinically concerning for recurrent or persistent disease were evaluated using HRCM and histopathologic examination. In 2 patients, video mosaics were created to evaluate large areas. Main Outcomes and Measures: Sensitivity and specificity of HRCM in identifying recurrent or persistent EMPD; causes for false-negative results according to their location, histopathologic findings, and previous treatments. Results: Of the 22 clinically suspicious sites evaluated in 5 patients (4 men, 1 woman; median [range] age, 70 [56-77] years), 9 (40.9%) were positive for recurrent disease on HRCM and histopathologically confirmed, and 13 (59.1%) sites were negative on HRCM, but 3 of the 13 were positive for EMPD on histopathological examination. In general, HRCM had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 100% in identifying recurrent or persistent EMPD. False-negative results were found in 2 patients and occurred at the margins of EMPD, close to previous biopsy sites. Creating video mosaics (or video mosaicking) seemed to improve the detection of EMPD. Conclusions and Relevance: Handheld reflectance confocal microscopy is a useful auxiliary tool for diagnosing EMPD recurrences and can be used to guide scouting biopsies, thus reducing the number of biopsies needed to render a correct diagnosis.

Indexed as

AgedBiopsyFalse Negative ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPaget Disease, ExtramammaryProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificitySkin NeoplasmsVideo Recording

Identifiers

PMID28492924
PMCPMC5507716
OpenAlexW2612712217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.