Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28492918›Full record

ArticleJAMA neurology2017

Association of a Primary Stroke Center Protocol for Suspected Stroke by Large-Vessel Occlusion With Efficiency of Care and Patient Outcomes.

Ryan A McTaggart, Shadi Yaghi, Shawna M Cutting, Morgan Hemendinger, Grayson L Baird, Richard A Haas, Karen L Furie, Mahesh V Jayaraman

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 111 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Drip and ship in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a narrative review.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Ryan A McTaggartDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island2Department of Neurology, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island3Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island4The Norman Prince Neuroscience Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
Shadi YaghiDepartment of Neurology, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island4The Norman Prince Neuroscience Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
Shawna M CuttingDepartment of Neurology, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island4The Norman Prince Neuroscience Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
Morgan HemendingerDepartment of Neurology, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island4The Norman Prince Neuroscience Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
Grayson L BairdDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island5Lifespan Biostatistics Core, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence.
Richard A HaasDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island3Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island4The Norman Prince Neuroscience Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
Karen L FurieDepartment of Neurology, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island4The Norman Prince Neuroscience Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
Mahesh V JayaramanDepartment of Diagnostic Imaging, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island2Department of Neurology, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island3Department of Neurosurgery, Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island4The Norman Prince Neuroscience Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island.
Providence College · USBrown University · USRhode Island Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: While prehospital triage to the closest comprehensive stroke center (CSC) may improve the delivery of care for patients with suspected emergent large-vessel occlusion (ELVO), efficient systems of care must also exist for patients with ELVO who first present to a primary stroke center (PSC). Objective: To describe the association of a PSC protocol focused on 3 key steps (early CSC notification based on clinical severity, vessel imaging at the PSC, and cloud-based image sharing) with the efficiency of care and the outcomes of patients with suspected ELVO who first present to a PSC. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this retrospective cohort study, 14 regional PSCs unfamiliar with the management of patients with ELVO were instructed on the use of the following protocol for patients presenting with a Los Angeles Motor Scale score 4 or higher: (1) notify the CSC on arrival, (2) perform computed tomographic angiography concurrently with noncontract computed tomography of the brain and within 30 minutes of arrival, and (3) share imaging data with the CSC using a cloud-based platform. A total of 101 patients were transferred from regional PSCs to the CSC between July 1, 2015, and May 31, 2016, and received mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke. The CSC serves approximately 1.7 million people and partners with 14 PSCs located between 6.4 and 73.6 km away. All consecutive patients with internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery occlusions transferred over an 11-month period were reviewed, and they were divided into 2 groups based on whether the PSC protocol was partially or fully executed. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were efficiency measures including time from PSC door in to PSC door out, time from PSC door to CSC groin puncture, and 90-day modified Rankin Scale score (range, 0-6; scores of 0-2 indicate a good outcome). Results: Although 101 patients were transferred, only 70 patients met the inclusion criteria during the study period. The protocol was partially executed for 48 patients (68.6%) (mean age, 77 years [interquartile range, 65-84 years]; 22 of the 48 patients [45.0%] were women) and fully executed for 22 patients (31.4%) (mean age, 76 years [interquartile range, 59-86 years]; 13 of the 22 patients [59.1%] were women). When fully executed, the protocol was associated with a reduction in the median time for PSC arrival to CSC groin puncture (from 151 minutes [95% CI, 141-166 minutes] to 111 minutes [95% CI, 88-130 minutes]; P < .001). This was primarily related to an improvement in the time from PSC door in to door out that reduced from a median time of 104 minutes (95% CI, 82-112 minutes) to a median time of 64 minutes (95% CI, 51-71.0 minutes) (P < .001). When the protocol was fully executed, patients were twice as likely to have a favorable outcome (50% vs 25%, P < .04). Conclusions and Relevance: When fully implemented, a standardized protocol at PSCs for patients with suspected ELVO consisting of early CSC notification, computed tomographic angiography on arrival to the PSC, and cloud-based image sharing is associated with a reduction in time to groin puncture and improved outcomes.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overArterial Occlusive DiseasesCerebral Arterial DiseasesClinical ProtocolsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospitalizationHospitals, SpecialHumansMaleMechanical ThrombolysisMiddle AgedOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness Index

Identifiers

PMID28492918
PMCPMC5710532
OpenAlexW2612205972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.